2006-08-19 22:11:38 · 5 answers · asked by Cho 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Last week's (Aug. 11) Economist magazine had a good critique. Kyoto is not the best answer -- it's skewed in such a way as to encourage China and India to waste energy and to pollute.
But it is a start. And something must be done.
The world cannot support its present population, all the more so if the poor get richer and start using more energy. And more water.
2006-08-19 22:32:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It gives exemptions to undeveloped countries, so the most polluting companies would move to those places and we'd have just as much pollution.
2006-08-20 05:19:34 · answer #2 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it would make President Bush's friends make less money.
2006-08-20 05:15:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes... i mean no. what?
2006-08-20 05:20:12 · answer #4 · answered by silas h 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 points please...
2006-08-20 05:18:07 · answer #5 · answered by clifton_woodruff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋