"what would you do?" = "what would you recommend?" because I couldn't fit the word 'recommend' in the Q box.
2006-08-19 20:56:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
As a rejoinder to the rest of recommendations, you may also try consolidating their inputs and facilitate the discussion and identification on their commonalities. Then let them develop, as a group, a summarized restatement of what's being described. In a way manipulating them into agreeing into each other and in the process eliminating the less acceptable ideas. If this doesn't work, grab a credible referrence material or an expert on the issues at hand.
2006-08-19 21:33:10 · answer #1 · answered by Henr 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A group decision does not have to be unanimous for the group to reach a consensus - go with the general consensus, or what the majority of members think. It won't make everyone happy, but it will move things along so that your group can reach its goals.
2006-08-20 04:05:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The group disinigrates or becomes useless or worse an impediment to any progress. Look at the UN as a present example of that. They may actually agree on what the word "disarm" means but they are not willing to match their words to their actions.
2006-08-20 04:07:41 · answer #3 · answered by gatzap 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Id recommend that what you should do is get out of the group
2006-08-25 19:03:57 · answer #4 · answered by mustang 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
firstly i try to understand them to what is the problem and the question seeking what. the most important thing is that we have to know a miniute description of problem. if it is not necessary for the particular problem then word meaning doesn't matter.
2006-08-20 04:28:58 · answer #5 · answered by Khan M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell I'll be honest. I'd go to 7-11 and get a slurpee and if I was real stressed I'd hit Albertsons and try Tequila
2006-08-20 04:03:01 · answer #6 · answered by Re Fined 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
decision by majority vote, or assign someone (name out of a hat kinda thing) to be the decision maker of things that cannot be commonly met.
2006-08-20 04:05:55 · answer #7 · answered by Mrs D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first of all, iwould define the word"meaning" and go from there. once you have gotten that out of the way,you would be surprised how quickly things will be resolved. hope i have helped.
2006-08-20 04:56:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Call yourself the US of A.
2006-08-26 18:59:12 · answer #9 · answered by sgeorges13 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
get a dictionary
2006-08-20 04:21:30 · answer #10 · answered by latina 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋