he looks likea sick twisted guy from his picture, and he said he "loved" jonbenet... but how could he have killed her by accident? she was strangeled? how do you "accidently" stangle someone? im confuzed......
2006-08-19 18:08:27 · 14 answers · asked by kiss the cook 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
oh and how were her parents abusive?> do they have any proff the dad was screwing her? augh that is so digusting
2006-08-19 18:15:27 · update #1
This is the problem when the media is only using this story to get ratings. The facts of the case are buried because the truth is not as interesting. And people are too lazy to question what the media is feeding them. The media should shut up and not let anyone be convicted by the press.
This man did NOT say he killed her. He said that he "was with her when she died." Which sounds to me like there was at least one other person present.
Also, there is no evidence that she was sexually molested and there was no evidence of drugs in her body. This is just an example how the media keeps sensationalizing a story to get ratings, whether it's the truth or not.
Everyone deserves a fair trial without prejudice, and I think everyone wants the REAL killer, to be caught, and that is a job for the police, not the media. There is serious issues in this case, and the media should let the FACTS speak for themselves.
2006-08-19 19:50:21 · answer #1 · answered by GoldnHart 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
People, you are falling into the media trap here. There is no hard evidence yet. Anyone can look up the facts of this case on the net. It's obvious that he is a seriously disturbed individual, HOWEVER - you're convicting him based on what you've seen on the TV and net news. Consider this. Why and when would he have had access to the Ramsey's home? How could he have known about the location of the grate leading to the basement? How could he have known the EXACT location of her bedroom, then take her downstairs in the middle of the night without waking anyone else in the house? She was killed by someone she knew. There's no evidence at all that he knew her personally or that he's EVER been to Colorado. A little healthy skepticism is in order here, until the DNA evidence comes back. Let's stop putting the cart before the horse, shall we?
2006-08-19 18:29:15 · answer #2 · answered by ReeRee 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes he calls it an 'accident'. Why are you even listening to him. Youre assumming this guy is 'ok' in the head. If he did do it he's justifying some sick erotic feelings he has for her.
And to correct some of these previous answers. John Karr's confession had many discrepencies but no one has completely written him off as a liar. Let us allow the police to do their job- they know more about this than we do.
2006-08-19 18:16:16 · answer #3 · answered by Sheyenne M 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah if he killed her on accident, why did he leave a ransom
note? Why are there so many holes to his story? How could he
have been there when his ex says that he was in Alabama with
her the night of the murder.
2006-08-19 18:15:30 · answer #4 · answered by retrodragonfly 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually, he said that he was with Jon Benet when she died and that she died accidentally.....it's his story. This is a sick individual but that doesn't make him the murderer; it will be an interesting investigation. It may end up that instead of guilty, he is giddy for his 15 seconds of fame.
2006-08-19 18:29:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know it's crap. I found a site where the autopsy pics of JonBenet are. How can you accidentally put a zip tie around a childs neck?
2006-08-19 18:15:44 · answer #6 · answered by Desiree J 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The guy was in trouble in Thailand and is getting a police escort out of there. I can't wait to hear his story once he is back on US soil.
2006-08-19 18:37:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether he says is was by accident or not please explain why he was in their house in the middle of the night and why did he have her in the basement in the middle of the night. He is a sick f*uck and he should get fried in the chair for what he did.
2006-08-19 18:15:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the story is confusing but you can read it on all the news sites.
Lots of things do not add up in the case or the confession
2006-08-19 18:13:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he even murdered her, I think he is saying it for the publicity. Let the DNA tell the truth.
2006-08-19 18:13:12 · answer #10 · answered by Amanda F 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋