English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Woodrow Wilson? It wasn't just Wilson.

At any moment of intense focus and heightened consciousness man tends to think that he has finally come to the turning point.

This is manifested throughout history.

men get carried away by their ideas and think the formula is wrong rather than the active participants in the equation.

The enlightenment thinkers were experiencing epiphany in the moment of accelerated technological awareness and progress, and they thought the things they were seeing were going to inform the actions of future men so as to solve the world's problem.

WW I occured shortly after a period of philosophical renewal in conjunction with the spirit of the so called social gospel, when great orators, thought that by applying the powers of government through salutary programs they would bring an end to poverty, oppression, exploitation, etc. etc. etc.

Actually, they had not discovered some new concept, they only had acquired a heighten level of concern and awareness of social ills because of the tendency of the industrial revolution to produce the dynamic of wealthy businessmen exploiting needy immigrant laborers.

After WW I it was the same deal. The war had been so horrific, that those men at that time felt a very deep sense of burden to never allow something like that to ever happen again.

From this great sensitivity to the horror of war arose the idea of not ever having war.

It became apparent that the war had accomplished nothing except carnage and therefore war was unnecessary. Of course that is a fading thought, and even their wonderful utopian ambitions ignored one thing.

War occur because somebody wants something.

Germany had taken from it everything it wanted, and all of the victorious powers after getting the victory they wanted and the reparations and land they wanted from Germany then went on to declare there would never be war again.

See the Kellog Briand pact and some of that other rhetorical crap.

Germany, sorely bruised from the handling of the victorious nations certainly wasn't so hot on the idea of never having war again, as we shortly saw.

All philosophical utopianism arises from a brief and shortsighted occurence of heightened consciousness or sensitivity to a problem or an epiphany of thought that so overcomes the minds of men in the present that practical reality and the question of human action seem not to come under consideration in their moment of "brilliance".

2006-08-19 19:26:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Google his fourteen factors. which could actually help you precise your paper, lol. He sought a peace which could extremely end all wars, even as the Allies sought retribution from Germany. Wilson went to Europe in my view to help broking service peace, yet he became prepared to renounce very nearly each little thing he requested for except for his concept of a League of international locations. it really is too a lot to write down in the following about all of it, yet in case you seem it up you could research it in large element. If Wilson had received extra concessions for Germany from the Allies, it might were very nearly not available for Hitler to upward push to power.

2016-11-30 20:51:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

because the horror of war and the enduring suffering of both solider and citizens was so horrific that the once glory of war was brought to true light and the cost of war was so over whelming in terms of life, civilization and economy that the future would learn from the past.

2006-08-23 13:51:02 · answer #3 · answered by hm10s4 2 · 0 0

Mostly the belief that the countries would begin to take much greater care in ensuring that such a large conflict that left so many dead would never occur again.

2006-08-19 18:24:45 · answer #4 · answered by Metzger 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers