English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

In the US, there is no presumption of privacy on a company's e-mail system. Employees can and are fired for violating company policy whether it's e-mail or too many trips to the water cooler.

Contrary to what someone else said here, there is no basis for a lawsuit if terminated for that reason. Most attorneys recommend that employers notify their employees that e-mail and internet is subject to monitoring, but here is no legal requirement to do so.

2006-08-19 17:17:09 · answer #1 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 2 0

This will have to do with the acceptable use policy that the employer has relating to email and internet usage. Usually, the employer will communicate this policy to the employees

any violation of the policy can result in termination.

So I guess the answer is yes.

2006-08-19 16:24:05 · answer #2 · answered by psychomanusa 2 · 2 0

An employer doesn't need a reason to fire anyone... at any rate depending on the employers policies, there not paying people to read there emails, thats like paying you to sit around on the clock and talk on the phone to all your family and friends or any other activity that has nothing to do with your job...

2006-08-19 16:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by suburbanstruggle 2 · 2 0

relies upon upon state regulation. present day situations have actual got here across a more effective element of personal privateness for some sorts of worker communique, now to not teach obstacles on no matter if an organization can take movements for something the worker stated in public. maximum of those are depending upon NLRB regulations with reference to the worker's precise to speak with others about operating circumstances. no matter if an organization hacking into an worker's inner most account on gmail is a criminal offense or civil violation will be a remember of state regulation as well. further, in the journey that they monitored your keystrokes even as you used a organization computer to do a banking transaction, it may be a federal crime for them to apply that PIN or password to get admission to that similar banking website. obviously, if there's a blanket coverage on own use of the organization pcs, then she will be fired for violating that coverage even with the content of her gmail and no matter if the boss accessed it.

2016-11-30 20:44:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

using personal email at work is to be avoided. Even though it is best-practice for employers to have employees sign acceptable use policies, even without them they can still take action against you for your use. lesson: dont do it unless u wanna get caught

2006-08-19 19:00:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The company OWNS the PC. You get to your personal email thru their mail server. Use business computers, phones, faxes, etc. for business purposes.

2006-08-19 17:20:00 · answer #6 · answered by What_Did_You_Expect 6 · 1 0

Have not been fired but know of some people that have been. Yes it can be justified.

2006-08-19 16:23:12 · answer #7 · answered by lyn_zie2003 1 · 2 0

if any body got fired they should sue, a judge expressed that using the internet its on the same level as using the phone or reading the paper.

2006-08-19 16:27:11 · answer #8 · answered by Maritza 3 · 0 2

I hope the lesson has been learned.

2006-08-19 17:34:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are S.O.L

2006-08-19 16:33:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers