English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This question goes out more to the conservative/independent base, since they make up the majority of common sense thought in America - Would you vote first for national security, or would you let domestic issues swing your decision? Point being, Guiliani WILL run for office in 08, along with several others, including McCain, Romney, etc. Guiliani DOES support gay rights, DOES support abortion rights, etc... but I feel that he would be FAR FAR more conservative than ANY other opponent in the running on the one topic that matters most - national security. I just hope that we don't get into a pickle and allow someone from the democrat ticket take the white house, because we were split on Guiliani.

2006-08-19 14:14:05 · 7 answers · asked by jdfehrenbach 1 in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

There is no way a Republican will EVER win the White House in 2008!!

Conservatives make absolutely no sense. Most have a lower IQ than Bush's 91!!!

2006-08-19 14:21:53 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2 1

I consider national security the biggest issue during an election, but the other topics also count. If another candidate is close to Guiliani on security and better on everything else, I would vote for the other guy. Luckily, only one Republican will run in the final election for president. If anything Guiliani will get more democratic votes than other GOP candidates because he has more liberal view on other issues. Since the Dems aren't likey to have a more conservative candidate than Guiliani, most Republicans will still vote Republican.

2006-08-19 21:50:02 · answer #2 · answered by royalrunner400 3 · 0 0

I'd never vote for the loser Guiliani because unlike you, I have common sense. And I plan on looking at ALL the issues equally, not just the 2 you mention. I plan on hiring the best person for the job of the presidency. And that certainly won't be the man who did some pretty f-ed up things in NYC before 9/11. He's had his spotlight. He won't get the vote anyway.

2006-08-19 21:22:56 · answer #3 · answered by SomeoneUdunno 3 · 0 1

Who says that the conservatives make up the "majority" of "common sense" thought in America. Not the last polls I saw. Matter of fact, a serious number of congressional seats and other political sets are to be replaced by democrats in the next election. YEA

2006-08-19 21:24:08 · answer #4 · answered by Tony T 4 · 1 0

If you watch only one conspiracy documentary ever, make it this one. This just might be the best introductory video out there. Understand that every claim made in this is fact, not opinion, no matter how wild it sounds. It's all easily verifiable through mainstream news archives and public documents.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7048572757566726569&q=Alex+Jones

2006-08-21 21:03:22 · answer #5 · answered by Sugi 2 · 0 0

You think that Guliani would be tougher on National Security than John McCain? That's ... interesting. If interesting was a word for crazy!

2006-08-19 21:22:45 · answer #6 · answered by Charles D 5 · 1 0

I am not a conservative, but after reading his book, I would vote for him. I think he has a realistic view of our world and the times we live in.

2006-08-19 21:24:04 · answer #7 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers