English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-19 13:21:37 · 11 answers · asked by heaven137000 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

11 answers

Bush
Because bush is doing something which is admirable while laden is killing people.

2006-08-20 13:07:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Bin Laden has sacrificed his wealth, comfort, and well being to stand up for his ideals, and he has done everything he can to incite violence against his enemies, resulting in the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians.

George Bush has sacrificed nothing personally but has deceived his country, Congress, and the United Nations in order to engage them in a unilateral, preemptive, imperialistic violence, in which tens of thousands of innocent civilians have been killed.

Both claim they are doing God's will and apparently have persuaded many others to think the same thing.

Both are dishonorable men.

I guess I'll have to leave the arithmetic up to you.

Their claim that God speaks to and through them is as paganistic as August Caesar or Nero.

Frankly, the one I fear the most is the one who is undermining our democratic republic, exerting his will over the rights of individuals, over the checks and balances of our Constitutional government, and over the "church" that he is attempting to merge with his "state."

Bin Laden is rebelling against the totalitarian government of Saudi Arabia, and not very effectively. Bush is undermining the democratic republic that he is supposed to uphold, and he's getting away with it.

2006-08-19 20:53:40 · answer #2 · answered by bfrank 5 · 0 0

I think it's a tie.They are both terrorists that have no reguard for anyone or anything that might get in the way of they're total domination and eventualy,the ruin of our civilization,I'm afraid.So glad I grew up in the 70's,I was happy and not worried about the world.Now.in my mid 40s,I sometimes have to close my eyes and just hope for the best.When we live in a time where the opportunity to mis-communicate can be shot down to us in seconds by the touch of a key pad,it's confusing and rushed.Who can we trust? not my "leaders" sad to say.But I know my husband will be home for dinner and my cat is basking in the last ligt of the day,so i calm myself and finish making dinner,glad that i still have that option.Where ever you are,I wish you peace,one world.....

2006-08-19 20:40:19 · answer #3 · answered by gypsycricket 4 · 1 0

It is imposible to use honor and that terrorist in the same sentence. President Bush would never send a child to explode in order to kill anyone. It is a shame that this question was ever considered.

2006-08-19 20:44:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

O god, there is so much to know !

Laden was CIA chief for years, he don't started from most trusted patriot on the USA to #1 public enemy...

He is in mission, they gave him 1 Billion$, they are forging the "right major crisis' they need to make the Nations accept their New World Order, ruled by the martial law, like Patriot act.

Bush is a Skull and Bone society member, the US faction of the Bavarians Illuminatis...

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Make you investigations about Jesuits, the New World Order, the Illuminatis, the Free-Masonery, the Death Clan. They plan a world reduction of population of 80%...Far worse than Hitler...


They haven't just collaborated...they financed Hitler, that was grand-father Bush, and the British crown, it's because, they are all blood related...All in the same secret society, they forged most of history events, they are the New World Order...
the Illuminatis...The Queen Mother's of England is the leader of the Free-Masonic branch of the Order...Blair is known as the Knight of Maltha, and Geaorge W. Bush knight of Eulogia, please inform yourself on those link I give you, but investigate far more than that...We have to stand against this...

1. Monetary and sex bribery was to be used to obtain control of men already in high places in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavor. Once influential persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati, they were to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and physical harm, even death to themselves and loved members of their families.

2. The Illuminati who were on the faculty of colleges and universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability and who belonged to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in Internationalism. Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships, like the Rhodes Scholarship, to those selected by the Illuminati. All such scholars were to be first persuaded and then convinced that men of special talent and brains had the right to rule those less gifted on the grounds that the masses do not know what is best for them physically, mentally, and spiritually.

2006-08-19 20:32:10 · answer #5 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 1 0

bin Laden get a load of respect becuase he is seen as "standing up" to the West

2006-08-19 20:26:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Honor to bush.......hes the only one who would go after bin laden, unlike you liberal pu$sies

2006-08-19 20:31:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

thats a really dumb question bin laden is just a wanna be dictator who wants to change your beliefs and your life.bush may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer but at least he wants you to be free to choose your own path.Do you think you could choose if they win? please THINK!

2006-08-19 20:41:45 · answer #8 · answered by brandon 2 · 0 0

Total shame on both. One, for putting his country apart, and the other for giving us muslims and Islam a bad name.

2006-08-19 20:26:38 · answer #9 · answered by ESKORBUTIN 4 · 1 1

Dishonor to both!

2006-08-19 20:27:46 · answer #10 · answered by Michael J 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers