Should people even get married anymore?

Question

I love my boyfriend, but do people get married because they want to or because they are pressured to by society? Do people even cherish marriage anymore? Do saying your vows mean anything? Why not just live together and be happy? Why bother getting a license? If it doesnt work out, and your single, you can just break up. Getting divorced means court and everyone knows. Whats the point?

Answer 1

you have the right additude. Marriage has lost its meaning, because either spouse can just end it whenever they want, the vows mean nothing anymore.

Answer 2

Hmm, well I actually think that most people get married because they are in love and believe it is forever...not because they feel pressured by society. Unfortunately, I do understand where you are coming from about people not cherishing their marriage anymore..I think that some marriages are far worse because their is so much more to fight about..I mean nowadays you are not only in debt..you are way in debt because of credit cards and people are stepping out on each other more these days...BUT I also think more people are reaching out for marital therapy more than they used to, which is good. Vows are something that should be cherished, but sooo many don't cherish them enough. Living together is fine for some people, but I personally think that if you live together for a long time( past the time of seeing what it feels like to live with that other person), then it is almost like you just don't want to commit to that person completely....like you are going to keep one foot out the door just incase. I think for me the point of being married is ...I feel the "marriage license" sealed the deal, and I am proud to say I am married. Just my two cents!

Answer 3

People should cherish marriage. God designed marriage to last a lifetime and marriage vows should mean something. Marriage should be for life not just until it doesn't work. There are legal issues also. For example if one of you were in an accident the other could be banned from the hospital and would have no legal say in treatment. You also could not be on each others insurance through employment or receive each others retirement or social security benefits. Marriage should not be entered into lightly and if you don't care enough about one another to be married and make the commitment then you certainly should have enough respect for yourself and the other person not to live together and be used until it doesn't work anymore.

Answer 4

In my opinion, you don't need marriage to be happy. You can be happy with each other without it. The problem with marriage are the people marrying for the wrong reasons. Then you have society making it too convenient to get a divorce. It's like buying a new car. When that car gets old and starts having problems, instead of fixing it, you just get rid of it. People have made it too disposable.

Answer 5

Objectively, there's no "point" one way or the other... In a legal and practical sense, our society does make things easier for married couples vs. couples who are simply "together". For many people, "marriage" still signifies a higher form of committment, and religious folks I'm sure put a lot of meaning into "marriage" as well. To me personally, marriage has just as much to do with pragmatic and practical reasons as it does with the significance of saying the "marriage vows". My goal has been to find a person to hopefully build a relationship with that would last for the rest of our lives; now that I have found him, there's not reason not to take advantage of the institution of marriage. (I realize that nothing is 100% fool-proof; there's always a possibility that we will stop seeing eye to eye at some point in the future, and will have to separate. But if I thought it was very likely, I wouldn't bother with the relationship at all... It's much more fun to just stay single. The whole point of a "relationship", to me, is to build a companionship that will last long-term.)

That's just my personal take, I'm sure there are as many opinions as there are people! :)

Answer 6

I easily have had quite a few photos at answering this question, I had to stop each and every time as a results of anger I felt in direction of you.Your husband is, through your own admission ,ill, and yet you imagine if is totally to ensure that you to bypass and commit adultery.It strikes me for you to be putting all of this ability that you've into searching the answer on your husbands ailment. try to be making positive that he's getting the right clinical interest. i'm appalled that you're even on your concepts pondering entering right into a bootleg affair. it really is through no skill the reply on your issues. it may basically exacerbate an already severe problem. Your husband needs each and each of the help that you factors and also you taking "your like to city" gained't earnings you and would basically make issues plenty worse. marriage isn't fairly a lot sex, there is so a lot more desirable to sharing existence than sharing a mattress. with the point to sum up, end a number of those concepts and commence the approach of having your husband properly. in case you prevail you'd be the more desirable helpful individual for it and your existence will be happier and truly a lot less complicated.

Answer 7

You have valid questions there...marriage is essentially in my opinion a contract unless you are a huge believer in God and all....I think it would probably be easier and cheaper for the vast majority of society to just co-habitate with one another.

On the down side though that leaves couples more likely to cheat on their partners and easier to leave because they will be less likely to bother to try to work things out since there is no contract binding them together....

I think people like the idea of the whole ceremony and the vows and the wedding reception etc. as well...

I was too broke for that stuff though...I had a 4 minute ceremony with a JP....cost me only $70....no wedding reception or white dress either...a real bummer but it was alot less expensive,,,,,

Answer 8

Once, I overheard a couple that had been married for a long time answer a similar question. Their answer was that people forgot that a real marriage needs three things:

(1) Commitment (2) Commitment (3) Commitment

...and that after you have that, almost everything else can be worked out.

I personally like that key word you used: "cherish."

People don't cherish each other anymore, they don't cherish their principles/morals, they don't Cherish their heritage/traditions/past as they should.

My opinion: it's not marriage that's broken, it's us...

Answer 9

Sorry, you sound way too cynical.

I got married because I love my husband. Our vows mean everything to us. We love each other, treat each other as equals, trust each other and honor our marriage.

YES, saying your vows means something - you make a promise to each other, to ALL OF your friends and family, and if you are religious, to God as well.

Why bother getting a license? Because marriage is not just a few words you say in a church, it is a legal and binding contract. It is also a financial contract. If my husband dies, our estate goes to me without a legal hassle. If we weren't married and he died... I would have no rights. I would have no say in his funeral arrangements, in his financial status, nothing. I would have no rights. We could not share health insurance through our employers, we could not share other benefits, and if we had children it would also be a legal nightmare.

The point is, that when you get married, if you do it for the right reasons and you are meant to be together, there won't be a divorce.

But I am happy knowing that by law and by love we are bound to each other for ever.

Answer 10

well depending on what state you live in and how long you live together....you can be "married" even if you don't want to be.
Common-Law marriage:
"sometimes called informal marriage or marriage by habit and repute is, historically, a form of interpersonal status in which a man and a woman are legally married. The term is often mistakenly understood to indicate an interpersonal relationship that is not recognized in law. In fact, a common law marriage is just as legally binding as a statutory or ceremonial marriage — it is just formed differently."

"There is no such thing as "common law divorce." Once a marriage is validly contracted, whether according to statute or according to common law, the marriage can only be dissolved by a legal proceeding in the pertinent trial court (usually family court or probate court).

Since the mid-1990s, the term "common-law marriage" has been used in parts of Europe and Canada to describe various types of domestic partnership between persons of the same sex as well as persons of the opposite sex. Although these interpersonal statuses are often, as in Hungary, called "common-law marriage" they differ from true common-law marriage in that they are not legally recognized as "marriages" but are a parallel interpersonal status, known in most jurisdictions as "domestic partnership" or "registered partnership."

"Common-law marriage can still be contracted in the following jurisdictions: Alabama, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, New Hampshire (posthumously), Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah. Note there is no such thing as "common-law divorce" - that is, you can't get out of a common-law marriage as easily as you can get into one. Only the contract of the marriage is irregular; everything else about the marriage is perfectly regular. People who marry per the old common law tradition must petition the appropriate court in their state for a dissolution of marriage."



So my question to you is: Wouldn't it just be easier to commit to each other and get the license even if just to oddly keep things easy