2006-08-19 12:10:22 · 12 answers · asked by wwe and tna r = 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Like Rhino, Cornett, Sting,and etc.
2006-08-19 12:12:01 · update #1
If he does it will only be to save his ratings.
If Vince McMahon is to cheap to bring back WCW what makes you think that he will purchase his competition.
2006-08-19 12:47:34 · answer #1 · answered by Rom 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
TNA is a sinking ship if more non-internet viewers dont catch on to it and actually buy the PPV's. I dont see Panda Energy dropping TNA anytime soon. However, a company can only back a product for so long before youre jus bleeding out your funds. The TNA video game should help, but then again, if it dont have the near quality or better than RAW vs SD!, it could jus flop in the long run.
The other problem is TNA can't compete with Vince's money, its just impossible for anyone in the wrestling industry to even try anymore. Vince owns WWE, wrestling is his life. Panda Energy owns 71% of TNA, corporate decisions have to be made when or if the crap hits the fan.. if Panda Energy sells that 71% to Vince.. well.. thats that.
However they have turned down many other large offers to buy it out from other companies.. probably projecting long term success in the future and its worth pushing the product as best as they can right now.
2006-08-20 06:08:06 · answer #2 · answered by Dawn of PacMan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that TNA should grow and become bigger like WCW at the time. Why? Because if you remember the Monday Night War between WCW and WWF it was freakin' awesome! Both side had no choice but to give one hell of a show to get the better ratings! And at this moment, WWE need strong competition to wake up Vince a bit.
2006-08-19 19:17:56 · answer #3 · answered by AbsoluteMart! 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no because of issuses that are stated in some of the contracts for the guys that work for tna wrestling. Stinger, can't work for vince because it has been talked about that he can't work for any one other then a ted turner owned or partially owned and operated company. sting had the chance almost 5 years ago when the wwe got GOLDBERG.
2006-08-19 19:55:11 · answer #4 · answered by dale_sr_021801 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the owners of tna wont let it happen if wwe did buy tna they would have so many wrestlers they would have to fire all of there current wrestlers to make room for actual talent.
2006-08-19 19:16:08 · answer #5 · answered by Jared 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it and I hope not. WWE needs more competition. Then maybe they will put more focus on making sure the show is good and not just a Vince's favorite picks show.
2006-08-19 19:28:05 · answer #6 · answered by MJ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I dont think so.. Well he is all about money, he is so hard to get WWE ratings and buying TNA might cost him alot of money and it shows that money is a mans best friend so i dont think so, he sold it to have more money and buying it back would be a waste of money to him.
2006-08-19 19:32:16 · answer #7 · answered by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i dont theres not to many good wrestlers besides sting, jeff jerrett, & aj styles
2006-08-19 19:18:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
who cares abiut mcmahons any way he could suck it and by the way he loves cocks
2006-08-19 19:19:40 · answer #9 · answered by UAI 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Vince ain't gonna do ****...
2006-08-19 19:15:40 · answer #10 · answered by Tony Montana 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋