After several different views and looking at the "collapse" in slow motion you can clearly see that the domino effect was helped out by some key explosions on floors beneath it. The initial hit from the plane into the tower and the intense heat from the jet fuel poured into the middle elevator shafts and stairwells adding to the unstable melt down of the infrastructure. Also if you have ever seen old building demolitions they use high explosives to implode the structure inward to prevent damage to surrounding are etc....if you notice the twin towers went down in a similar fashion. Funny how this all came to be ...and I don't believe the official WTC version of this tragedy.
2006-08-19 12:35:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by fxbeto 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
First of all, what 'law of physics" supports your claim that a steel structure cannot collapse and free fall speed? Second, your premise is faulty because there were a lot more building materials than just steel, particularly concrete. Third, you haven't defined what you mean by free fall speed. Finally, there is no reliable evidence to contradict the "official" version of how the buildings collapsed.
2006-08-19 12:37:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Carl 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think the worst thing we could do as scientists is over analyze conspiracy theories in the collapse of the WTC. I think we should identify how to build a more solid structure but not investigate conspiracy theories!
2006-08-19 12:16:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by scottwatras 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
You're right! Thanks for pointing that out to all of us. You must have studied physics under The Three Stooges.
Just like those buildings which are demolished using explosives on the ground floor pillars. They don't fall down either - your "special laws of physics" keep them standing --- the demo contractor just makes a lot of smoke, dust and noise, and removes the building using Photoshop in the "after" pictures.
Man, you got to start reading a different set of comic books. The ones that you read aren't worth the money you paid.
2006-08-19 12:20:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tom-SJ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm tired of the morons going off about this...
Obviously, reasonable intelligent answers don't sink through. In that regard I found the perfect link to debunk this lunacy. Thank you Maddox for a succint analysis.
If for some reason you want to try an informed overview try Popular Mechanics;
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
and for a point by point dissection of "Loose Change" try;
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
Neither are short, and both require critical thinking. Not for the MTV generation, if you find it too dense just check out http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons for a more succinct answer.
2006-08-19 12:56:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Osama Bin encumbered, the mastermind in the back of the attacks, coordinated the hijackings of four airliners and flew them into both international commerce centers, the Pentagon, and the superb crashed right into a field in Pennsylvania after the passengers fought decrease back and took it over. round 3,000 individuals lost their lives. in case you imagine something else is the reality then shame on you. That became the most horrendous day in American heritage and it has replaced us continually.
2016-11-26 02:20:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here we go again.
So, what happened to all of those people on the planes? Where did they go?
How do you explain what happened at the Pentagon? Was that a conspiracy too?
What about the people who went down on flight 93? I would love to hear the explanation for that.
You conspiracy theorists make me sick!!!
2006-08-19 12:18:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by tina m 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you can read see Mechanic's Illustrated With physics professor's doing the math
Like granddad said you can let people think you are a fool or open your mouth and prove it
2006-08-19 12:17:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Proud Republican 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
We know for certain that the towers collapsed. I don't see how your statement addresses the cause one way or another.
2006-08-19 15:24:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
whether Bush or Bin laden,, the damage was done,, the lives lost,, the injuries sustained,,, the love for America throughout the world,, gone,,,, GWB and team are hell bent on nuclear war with Iran just as they were with Iraq,,,,,,,,,
2006-08-19 12:17:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋