English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

These are my favorite:

Example 1

A picture of a steel beam, from one of the towers, that has been cut using an explosive (Thermate). Click pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

Example 2

A semi clear picture of Osama, taken from "his" confession video, compared and contrasted to his photograph.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml

2006-08-19 11:53:56 · 15 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5 in Politics & Government Government

"Big sweetie" Do you have a favorite piece of evidence to support this view ?

2006-08-19 12:21:46 · update #1

"jeff*" Was there evidence of the plane sliding, on the ground ?

2006-08-19 12:32:22 · update #2

"interested" Did these engineers provide some evidence that you particularly liked ?

2006-08-19 12:49:04 · update #3

"Pachl@sbcglobal.net" Personally, I prefer evidence.
Common sense once told us the world was flat.
Common sense once told us the sun rotated around earth.

2006-08-19 13:01:10 · update #4

"Jesi" As far as I'm able to tell, the firemen picture is authentic: At least, the shadows all fell in place for me.
A larger segment of his confession video, is available in the following video: It is toward the end of the video, at 1:12:07.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
I would love to try to impress you, but I only had a few weeks of vacation time to spend on this research. Any extra time I have in the future, I'm thinking of using for travel.
Take care ...

2006-08-19 13:21:24 · update #5

"Jesi" That video again is:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5946593973848835726

2006-08-19 13:23:25 · update #6

"rochelle_hall2000" Again, I prefer evidence.
If 911 is an inside job, we invaded them; or at least our government did, in false pretense.

2006-08-19 13:46:39 · update #7

"nigelbestpeace" Wow ! That's a big list. Are they all your favorites ? You must have at least a few that you especialy like and can document.

2006-08-19 14:38:37 · update #8

"Vicki1970" I take it you don't have a favorite piece of evidence either; You should find one !

2006-08-19 15:04:40 · update #9

"Ron Allen" I have seen that video, and it does apear to be "Proof Positive": Yet, many people continue to believe what they are told, rather than what they know to be true. It's as if some power has learned how to control the "non thinking mind": they are herded like a cowboy herds cattle, with sight and sound (bang, bang).

2006-08-22 05:37:53 · update #10

"Jesi" It appears the firemen are wearing a semi transparent viser, in front of their helmets, causing a light shadow on the face of the firemen on the left. Easy to miss: You can enlarge the picture futher, by saving the image.

2006-08-22 06:08:09 · update #11

15 answers

I think it was the missle hole in the pentagon, and the apparent no evidence of wings that flew into the building. And the demolition explosions on the WTC towers.

2006-08-19 12:03:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

My evidence for and recently discovered is found in this video.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2205940254635302539&q=9%2F11+jones+thermite

The thing about this evidence is that there is no speculation or guessing involved. I remember my very first reaction on the very day of the event was "why on earth did these building fall?" As this was only my gut intuition I put it down for a few years and kept it down even after seeing several prior conspiracy theories. All the theories I saw up til now I deisregarded because there was no hard evidence presented in any of it. A lot was based on guesswork and supposition. Along with emotionally charged statements. I think "Loose Change" falls into this category..

I'm looking for ways that this data in Steven Jones' presentation can be refuted, but so far I can't. It doesn't appear to be refutable. If this is true that the September 11th incident was planned by our own government and we the citizens of this country do nothing, then the consequences of our inaction are very likely to be dire. But how can we ever be sure that we have the truth? And history has shown repeatedly that even with the truth known by some it wasn't enough as most people will believe what they believe without consideration to alternatives.
that's just it....a belief. We believe a dollar is a dolllar. Can we believe that a dollar is a thousand dollars? Can we believe a dollar is an explative? a slice of something that we have with bacon and eggs in the morning? How do you change things that people belive in that have been in place for so long? Has it happened before in History? If it has what was involved? Maybe that's the most pertinent line to follow now.

2006-08-20 16:27:31 · answer #2 · answered by Ron Allen 3 · 1 0

I'm assuming you realize that the angles of the shadows on the two guys are off, the guy on the left has shadows on his face with the sun coming from behind his right ear, the guy on the left's face is at noon or there abouts on his face, but the legs are different. So right now this picture is my favorite against since its obviously been doctored (two people facing opposite directions, both looking into a shadow.)

As far as the Osama video is concerned you should include a link to the confession video so we can compare a photo of bin laden to the video, not to a photo you say is from the video.

I love a good conspiracy theory, makes great entertainment. But you have to know when to draw the line between entertainment and reality.

I also find the conspiracy theories surrounding the Pentagon to be, arguably, more convincing. Although they all discount mass and inertia, but they sound realistic. And as far as Flight 93 is concerned, tell me it was shot down and tell me how we know, and you'd impress me..

2006-08-19 12:51:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Sorry, I have no physical evidence to cite, just my own rationale why 9-11 is not some inside plot by our government.

Before 9-11, the U.S. looked like an impregnable fortress. With the exception of the first WTC bombing (which did minor damage), it must have appeared foreigners that the U.S. was unassailable. No President would ever give up that advantage!

Also, the WTC disaster cost our country $87 Billion. Now, I realize we are all very jaded nowadays. We hear the term "Billion" over and over, but that is an astronomical amount of money. It practically threw the entire country into a huge recession. It took a huge budget surplus and threw us back into massive deficit spending. No President would want that on his record.

Common sense should be just as valid as physical proof.

2006-08-19 12:40:01 · answer #4 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1 1

Because Iran and North Korea, and Venezuela and Cuba are still trying their best to KILL US ALL...If you spent as much time "investigating" these bozo's as you do trying to prop up the democrats as a legitimate government entity, you would definately change your point of view...The " MUSLIM " clerics that are behind this mess, want only, only... -loyal- Muslims to walk around on this earth....IF YOU AIN'T MUSLIM....YOU AIN"T SURVIVIN'....They will kill YOU, yes, YOU, the very first opportunity they can get...If they make it to where YOU live Nancy pelosi's smart asssss mouth AIN"TA GONNA throw up a force field for YA...My guess is you'll be beggin' a Republican sort to save your assssss thats my proof.


Common sense told us not to vote for Gore or Kerry.
Common sense told us Teddy Kennedy can't drive.
Common sense told us Jimmy Carter should be a laborer.
Common sense told us Clinton will not avenge the death of Americans.

I gotta say this....where the hll were you people on 911 in a cave with bin Laden...???
Several million people " witnessed " the actual planes hitting the towers. NO trick of the camera for the locals in NYC that are dead injured,scarred, and God knows what else. They saw and felt the planes for real, WAKE UP they weren't killed (3500) by conspiracy theories...they were killed with jet fuel in an inferno,andd millions of pounds of falling concrete.

2006-08-19 12:57:58 · answer #5 · answered by rochelle_hall2000 3 · 0 1

You must have been listening to some crazy left-wing nut. Nobody with at least half a brain believes the US did this to ourselves. It's like the argument that the holocaust never happened. It's like the argument that "So Damn Insane" did not have weapons of mass distruction (EVERYONE accepted this as true including all US Presidents and even Teddy Kennedy). Such nonsense is spouted by pawns of our adversaries. You need to find a website to debunk your silly urban legends.

2006-08-19 12:16:20 · answer #6 · answered by Big Bama Fan 2 · 1 1

i visit't discover the hyperlink now, yet I study the position a form of German and Swiss engineering scholars equipped a handful of structurally-perfect scale fashions of the dual towers, and couldn't even come on the breaking point of having the towers to fall the way they did utilising basically jet gas and construction elements for accelerants and a warmth source, as became authentic in the unique disaster. the superb they could do became to get 2 of them to soften adequate on one side for the load of the right flooring to tip them over like dominoes. Consensus agreed that in all probability, basically fee-shaped demolitions through educated experts might want to get them to topple instantly down rather than tipping over to one side, the side opposite the position the jet gas and wind were coming from. also, there is not any logical reason in the international why construction # 7 must have collapsed through itself basically from its proximity on my own. It wasn't fairly all that close and the winds were extremely calm. It became a a lot, a lot shorter construction and warm temperature rises, it does no longer sink. it quite is between the most elementary regulations of nature.

2016-11-26 02:17:50 · answer #7 · answered by karsten 4 · 0 0

Well, certain facts are rather questionable but when planes crash their wings will often explode because that is where the fuel is stored, they will also disinigrate on the ground if the plane slides. That is why there is little wing damage done to the pentagon.

2006-08-19 12:25:25 · answer #8 · answered by jeff a 2 · 0 1

this is for now every try this its freaky....1st go to microsoft word and type Q33NY(which is the first plane #)make sure the letters are cap.......then swiitch size to 72 and change the font to Wingdings!!!!!! super freaky!!!!!!!!!

2006-08-19 12:00:29 · answer #9 · answered by trumpetboy1333 2 · 0 0

Mechanic's Illustrated article with the math proving what we know is true

2006-08-19 12:00:17 · answer #10 · answered by Proud Republican 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers