He told the truth once. He said the war was started because of faulty intelligence. You have to give him that one.
2006-08-19 11:54:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by EPnTX 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
He started kicking the aaases of the terrorists that Bill Clinton refused to acknowledge...He freed the Iraqi people from Saddam...they don't have to worry anymore that their entire family will be exterminated for asking questions like you just did...He called terrorist what they truly are--"Islamic Facists". He doesn't rule the country by which way the wind blows (POLLS). He plods on with the message that the terrorists have nowhere to hide...Gore, Pelosi, Biden, Lemont, etc...want President Bush to " cut and run " so that he will look like a coward, and the Democrats can say "I told you so"...Bush Is no coward and the Democrats are putting our soldiers MORALE to the test by supporting the same positions that the terrorists take...Bush is probably using the Democrats as bumbling pawns in this war....Let the Democrats make the terrorists " THINK " we are weak....then KICK THEIR ASSSSSSS The victims of the 911 attack deserve more than the Democrat leaders Be afraid of Bush (terrorists)...Be VERY afraid !!!!!!
2006-08-19 19:28:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by rochelle_hall2000 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
He is a politician. More likely he does things that he THINKS are good for the people. That he think will help America. It is absolutly no different from Bill Clinton or any other president. They all do wrong things, and they all do right things, they are human. And the only reason people are against him is because we are in a war. And practically no one can see the good in war, and there might not be, but there is the same chance there is good in a war. My personal opinion I don't really like him. But I really don't like any politician. I don't even know why we label someone republican or democrat. We should be hearing what they are saying before, instead of, "Well he is republican I won't vote for him."
2006-08-19 19:01:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Okay, I am a die hard democrat, but fair is fair. President Bush truly stepped up and held this country together in the days immediately following 9/11. I am really not sure Al Gore could have done the same.
To all of my fellow democrats, I am sorry.
2006-08-19 20:21:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by miki m 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I honestly can't think of a single thing. No wait.. Okay here's one. The No Child Left Behind Act, and even I'm straddling the fence on that one.
2006-08-20 01:59:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you watch only one conspiracy documentary ever, make it this one. This just might be the best introductory video out there. Understand that every claim made in this is fact, not opinion, no matter how wild it sounds. It's all easily verifiable through mainstream news archives and public documents.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7048572757566726569&q=Alex+Jones
2006-08-23 15:56:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sugi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He'd done lots of things that arguably can be considered good. and if you're on his political side, lots and lots of things.
But the question is: do other good works excuse him from willful violations of federal law and betrayal of his oath of office?
Is it a balancing act, or do we hold people accountable for their criminal actions regardless of how much other good they might have done? And is the standard different for politicians?
You decide.
2006-08-19 19:08:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
How many terrorist attacks have there been on this country since 9/11?
2006-08-20 11:31:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's made plenty of people become more liberal and change parties (if not to Democrat, then definitely to Libertarian or Independent). And that's a good thing. :-)
2006-08-19 18:55:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rogue Scrapbooker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Positives huh... I'll list them for you.
1.
On second thought, I'll get back to you
2006-08-19 19:39:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by RATM 4
·
0⤊
0⤋