It occurs to me that Ossama bin Ladin and George W Bush have become co-dependents. Bush's remaining strength (fighting terror) is dependent on the perceived strength of public enemy number one -- bin Ladin. Bin Ladin's leadership and strength -- of mythic proportions -- is dependent on his public enemy status. Right before the last presidential elections, bin Ladin released a threatening tape which gave Bush a bump in the polls. In spite of voting irregularities Bush was declared the winner for a second term. Should we expect another threatening bin Laden tape just before the congressional elections? A shift in congressional power could jeopardize the rubber stamp congress and Bush's free reign.
2006-08-19 11:33:22 · 9 answers · asked by murphy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
without a doubt osama is a smart cookie, but releasing another video before the next elections will not sway the american public that much...
2006-08-19 11:39:29 · answer #1 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i do not recognize if (or why) it would want to change a persons vote. yet i do not imagine he's punctiliously a fictional man or woman. i imagine "he" is a real man or woman and intensely effective, yet i imagine some (maximum) of his funding for the terrorist attacks he has released have come from different people. It became stated that back interior the ninety's even as Clinton became in workplace that Osama became captured and became going to be handed over the the U. S. (in replace for something i'm particular...i became nevertheless a youngster so i do not shop in concepts each and every of the detials of the priority) yet that bill Clinton stated the u . s . a . had to situation with him and they enable him flow. So i recognize "he' exists, yet i do not recognize that one and each and every of the money/guns etc. is genuinely his.
2016-11-05 04:43:42 · answer #2 · answered by zubrzycki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows. Bush need to realize that bin Ladin or any terrorist are not a sign that "might is right".
2006-08-19 11:40:27 · answer #3 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good Grief, you guys are making up excuses before the elections, before you even lose. Can Democrats never give Americans the credit to vote the way they feel. Hanging chads? stealing elections? & now Bin Laden, give me a break.
WHINE! WHINE! whine! Change your name to whineycrats.
2006-08-19 11:45:01 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
either that, or do like he did in Spain...and plan another attack.....yes, you have it right, the world governments love Bin Laden, he will attack anyone for a little money, even to help win an election.....NOT!!!!
2006-08-19 12:04:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton is the president who refused him 5 times ,and you claim he is in with Bush .You must have a mental disorder to say this
2006-08-19 11:47:36 · answer #6 · answered by Proud Republican 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
sure it's the deal between the republican and osama bin laden!!
2006-08-19 11:40:11 · answer #7 · answered by sstooc2001 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
depends- if you guys field another moron then "yes- this excuse will work again"
2006-08-19 11:39:36 · answer #8 · answered by R J 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
lets see
2006-08-19 11:44:58 · answer #9 · answered by caramoanboy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋