They're politicians. Given the wrong circumstances, all politicians are potentially evil.
2006-08-23 01:48:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by opossumd 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree somewhat with what bone said. Here is the thing your talking about so many children dieing. Where? Are we talking about the katrina crisis and how he didnt respond quick enouph or are we talking about the isreal and middle east crisis. I want to make it known that although mr bush doesnt respond nearly as quick as a commander and chief should i think the problem is part to blame on his part however i blame the american people who continue to upspring on programs bush creates for example!!!!!! The phone tapping deal? Why is it going to court? because it violates the freedom of speech act? This is one thing president bush does not want any part of listening to the next pot head or small crime crap he just wants to be able to know if terrorist activity is going on. Just so everybody knows this when was the last big terror attack? Thats right since september 11th there hasnt been one the bad thing is people keep knocking his programs down. Did you know that his give money to the rich and take more from the poor scheme actually has created a big or huge job market it worked out just like he had planned. Jobs keep food on the table food on the table keeps people alive. So when everybody critisizses mr bush i want them to know that i believe yes he has done some wrong but he has done alot of good as well you just cant see it because you and i and everybody else focus on the negitive. How about the education program no children left behind? That has created a smarter usa stats show it. So again yes bush isnt the best president nor do i think he is the worst. Remember that there are to many conflicts to resolve in on term let alone two terms because not everything you do gets approved by congress. Now if we are going to talk about iraq yes it is sad and we shouldnt of went in there but in the same sence on the bright side in hope bush is trying to set up peace among the middle east because they continue to cause problems. So if bush didnt take care of the problem what president in the future would have and if a future president did what would you have to say about him? I will let you think about that.
2006-08-19 11:40:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where do you draw the line??? I mean just when does a person lose their value. Is it 12, 14, 16; or let me guess when a person reaches America's legal age of 18 they lose their value. Suggesting that a person has greater value because of their age is evil because it's that kind of lunatic morality that believes that because people die in war it must be evil and the wrong method. I don't hear anyone asking is Bin Laden or Saddam Hussein evil because they slaughter people for no other reason than it pleases them. The reason why is because everyone knows their evil. Also remember that to them they are doing what is right. Just like Hitler, Bin Laden and all the others thought they were doing right. So how do we distinguish who is truly evil. The only objective way is through logic and I am yet to read or hear anyone using that.
2006-08-19 11:37:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, They are trying to do their best in these harsh times. Innocent children as well as adults are killed in wars and America and great Great Britain are trying to stop terrorism that's threatens our way of life as well as others, that is a war. How many Innocent children have been killed by the decisions of the leaders of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya and the other Arab countries. I am not saying that mistakes were not made, but in the heat of war mistakes happen.
2006-08-19 11:44:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Taiping 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many innocent people could have been killed if the likes of Saddam Hussain was still able to control countries. Many innocent people may have died from strikes ordered by Bush & Blair but much more could have been killed should they have not interveined.
I agree with their actions and stand by them 100%. We cannot allow ourselves to be dictated by extremeists. Innocent people get killed in every war... it is unfortunite but at least when we strike we like to believe that we are targeting the right people. I lost a friend in the London bombings... he was a civilian on his way to work as a fitness instructure. He lost his life... not knowing why!
2006-08-19 11:34:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Johny0555 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We cannot say that.
They may be safeguarding many others who otherwise would be killed by someone else. Events are to take place. Reasons or the persons involved may be different. If Bush and Blair don't do that, someone else will do it. Christ was to be betrayed. If Judas didn't do it, Peter would have or John had to do it.
So I don't blame their decisions.
2006-08-20 18:13:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by latterviews 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
perhaps children in london died because of blairs decisions but whats he supposed to do..He followed his boyfriend into this war and now he has to see it through. give him time and see what happens when bush chucks him. Oh by the way...many children died in the first 2 wars...maybe we should stop being politically correct and do it properly and finish it quickly. Don't blame bush and blair but look to those who are twisted and dont understand what the true meanings of their religion are. If I had my way with those scum......!
2006-08-19 11:47:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Stephen D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Easy to blame Bush and Blair isn't it?
If it wasn't those guys in power it would be others, and children would still be dying.
Haven't you thought that maybe it is just the nature of people - and that is why the world is corrupt and people are dying? We are just glorified apes after all, never going to be perfect is it?
2006-08-19 11:32:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think evil is too strong a word. I think Blair is basically a weak man. I think Bush is misguided.
Evil is what I would call the terrorists who blow up trains and planes.
2006-08-19 11:32:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jude 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of themselves, they are not any more evil than any one else. Their decisions in some cases have been poorly informed and based on purposes that had no good or redeeming values. They have created the mess, now we have to wait and see if they can or even intend to get themselves out of it.
2006-08-19 11:32:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by St N 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, they are evil because they maintain power by inducing fear among their populations.
They have nothing to offer but Machiavellian thuggery, little has changed in history. Rulers will use the same tricks over and over because the people are too stupid to realize the control tactics.
2006-08-19 11:30:43
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋