2006-08-19 08:12:45 · 14 answers · asked by paperdoll824 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Undertaker is a much better wrestler than Booker T. I ve been watching wrestling for alot of years and Booker T is just a big whiney baby. And also he doesnt need a woman in his corner to help him win matches. I think all wrestlers should come to the ring alone. Too much interference from outside the ring.
2006-08-19 08:25:17 · answer #1 · answered by ncpeterpan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Undertaker
2006-08-19 15:22:42 · answer #2 · answered by oh-so- Laid-back 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Undertaker!
2006-08-19 15:19:38 · answer #3 · answered by cookiemonster505 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think most people will agree that The Undertaker is better than King Booker.
2006-08-19 15:17:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You cannot compare The Undertaker to Booket T. There is a reason why we call The Undertaker: The Phenom!
2006-08-19 15:45:57 · answer #5 · answered by AbsoluteMart! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im an undertaker fan, but he can't wrestle. booker is better, from a wrestling stand-point. Taker is more entertaining, though.
2006-08-19 15:17:24 · answer #6 · answered by HizardcoreMike 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
undertaker
2006-08-19 15:31:51 · answer #7 · answered by asslko 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
UNDERTAKER IS BETTER THEN BOOKER T
2006-08-19 15:23:00 · answer #8 · answered by wolfelady692003 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
undertaker
2006-08-19 15:19:08 · answer #9 · answered by mfn193 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the undertaker no doubt
2006-08-19 15:54:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋