English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Israel agreed to the truce and violated it, that is a fact.
Hez-Ebola is a terrorist organization BUT has not violated said agreement also a fact.

(by the way I know how to spell Hezbollah...it is just sarcasm)

2006-08-19 07:59:42 · 9 answers · asked by mymadsky 6 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

Bzzzt Wrong

No truce or peace agreement was reached outside the walls of the UN.

Hezbollah will not disarm

Lebanon can not police it's own country.

Israel will not allow Hezbollah to indiscriminately kill it's citizens.

Go big Red Go

2006-08-19 08:20:35 · answer #1 · answered by 43 5 · 1 0

Israel hav 10 000 Muslim jailed illegally.

Hezbollah kidnapeed 2 Israel soldiers to make money exchange.

So Israel, use this pretext, to go kill a Palestian family. 2 kids dead, 2 adults dead, and 2 adults survived. They tell to eveyone, and retaliate.

So Israel use this pretext to go destry all infrastructures, violating so many internationals conventions...and destry all transportations devices, ( car, trains, etc.) And break the whole economy of is neightbor. Then all roads, bridges, rails, etc.

Israel killed over 1000 civilians, shooting everywhere, everything.
Even a darn U"N" post...clearly identified, and Israel use the finest technology in the world..

Hezbollah shoot stupids rockets...they had like 30-50 fighters....wow, what an army...they killed like 27 Israeli soldiers, injured some civilians.

I am not sure Hezbollah is a real resistance, but sure, someone had to do something, no ONE CAME TO HELP...

Finaly, I think Israel is controled by Zionists, not Jews, and Hezbollah might be another lodges of the bavarians Illuminatis, or infiltered, to forge the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World Order, ruled by the martial law, like Patriot Act.

Zionists are a faction of the Illuminatis, like the Skull and Bone society in USA, or Free-Masoney in UK and France...

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

2006-08-19 08:16:47 · answer #2 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 1 0

The land of "Israel" should be split in half. The northern half would be Palestine and the southern half Israel.
In the middle occupying Jerusalem would be the U.N. with a corridor that divides these lands from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea. Stationed there should be 200,000 man Rapid Reaction Force capable of delivering a serious smack down to ANYONE in the region that acts out of line.

This solution creates peace in the region and gets the U.N. out of New York .

2006-08-19 15:02:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No cease fire took place because hezbollah violated it first, they refuse to disarm and they refuse to stop receiving weapons from there parents, but this will just start the ridiculous back and force comments of people yelling israel are the terrorists and/or hezbollah is the terrorists, leave it be already, one way or another until everyone hezbollah and israeli kill themselves this war will never end, its been going on for longer than I can remember.....

2006-08-19 08:07:09 · answer #4 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 1 1

Israel did not violate the terms of their agreement..This is a fact...
Israel maintained its right to attack Hezbolla attempts to re-arm.
I certainly hope Hezbollah resumes their attacks against Israel
such that Israel gets another opportunity to get the job done and
wipe out Hezbollah..

2006-08-19 08:07:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

to finish that could want to require a UN decision to act. this gained't take position because both the U.S. and tremendous Brittain might want to veto this form of decision. Attacking yet another united states for U.N. violations isn't immediately justified.

2016-11-26 02:01:24 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

How many UN resolutions did Israel comply to, and how many it refused even to recognize ?

How many time did the U.S. used the VITO right in the security council to protect Israel?

almost ALL UN resolution is refused by Israel ! (go and check the UN archive !)

2006-08-20 09:13:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous 1 · 0 0

Then just spell it correctly.

2006-08-19 08:05:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Did you try to spell condom? Go ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!

2006-08-19 08:05:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers