And explain why you think so.
2006-08-19 06:30:34 · 15 answers · asked by Hector Rolle 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm rooting for Barack Obama. He's the best spoken person I've heard in thirty years, his ideas are both well-conceived and palatable to a wide range of people, and he has that mysterious charisma that inspires people.
2006-08-19 07:07:25 · answer #1 · answered by Steve 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. i imagine a third get at the same time candidate which could no longer advised what to assert or do by technique of his company paymasters might want to win for once. and that i have self assurance more effective human beings might want to open their options and are available across third get at the same time options. save in options, Democrats and Republicans are merely 2 activities in a field of dozens. they don't look to be your in uncomplicated words selection. And in numerous circumstances, no longer the wise selection. it would want to take it sluggish to analyze different applicants available, yet once you do you'd be satisfied you probably did. Libertarian, vegetables, Socialist, structure, and so on. in uncomplicated words after we open out minds politically can we progression. ignore with regard to the well-known public relatives hype campaigns behind Hillary Clinton or the destiny Republican presidential candidate (Jeb?) and imagine for your self. it truly is fresh.
2016-11-26 01:56:10 · answer #2 · answered by pfarr 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama is a good choice perhaps, but it might be too soon for him. He could use some more experience under his belt.
Besides, I could see the Republicans mentioning his name on the talk shows and doing the whole "So the Democratic candidate Osama... er... excuse me Obama was speaking yesterday...."
After all, if they are dirty enough to have a commercial which had the word Democrats fade, but the letters R...A....T...S would fade a little slower than the rest of the word.... odd are they would have a field day with trying to associate Obama with Osama.
2006-08-19 07:11:37 · answer #3 · answered by the master of truth 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No one can stop Hillary from getting the Democratic Nomination. She's too smart for all of them.
If anyone gives her too much competition, they may have an "accident". Research all the dead bodies in Arkansas. Scary.
(Interesting that she supports Bush in Iraq and other areas.)
2006-08-19 06:40:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Russ Feingold
Clinton was wrong on the war from jump! And she remains wrong to this day!
Feingold was right on the war, on the Patriot Act, and the Bush spying program.
Having said that I also believe the cowardlty Democrats will nominate Clinton anyway because they are the party of Joe Lieberman.
2006-08-19 06:37:08 · answer #5 · answered by Edward K 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
John Edwards he still has his delusions of grandeur or Joe Biden. Joe is most likely the best candidate from either party...so he won't win the nomination.
2006-08-19 06:39:53 · answer #6 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Main challengerS are: Joe Biden, Evan Bayh and John Edwards.
Why? Simply because they are men and that, unfortunately, is the mindset of Americans by and large still in this country.
2006-08-19 06:36:35 · answer #7 · answered by crowbird_52 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Way to go birdsnakecat !
Myself I got PERFECT ENLIGHTENMENT once joung JFK's plane malfunctioned.
Not that anyone would remember anthing about that now, right ?
It was known that the young scion was going for NY Senator, anf the American people were viscerally looking for a fresh face.
Well-intentioned ambition often contributes to accidents.
2006-08-19 06:59:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We probably do not know yet. One hopes it is a governor, as a Governor has been elected President every single election since 1968.
2006-08-19 06:36:37 · answer #9 · answered by robert_dod 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lieberman!!! The DimocRAT party screwed him and that is one reason he is running as a Indepentant.
2006-08-19 06:35:50 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋