THE PLANES WERE JUST AN EXCUSE TO HAVE SOMETHING TO BLAME THE FALLING OF THE BUILDING ON. AS WE ALL BELIEVED AT THE TIME, IT LOOKED CRAZY! I HAVE VIDEO THAT IT WAS NOT THE PLANES.
2006-08-19 04:28:56 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance ➔ Renting & Real Estate
Only the ones with zero engineering knowledge. No Mathematics. They also have to disbelieve any number of investigations which all came to the same conclusion (although having Gorelick on the 9/11 panel was the richest irony I've seen in recent years).
You're promoting that "Loose Change" movie, aren't you? I always wondered how many logical fallacies, and how it was possible to pack into an hour and twenty minute movie, and now I know. I always wanted to know exactly how far willful denial could take people, and now I know.
If you haven't seen Farentheit 1861, here's a link
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1153159073739939801
2006-08-19 12:16:46 · answer #1 · answered by Searchlight Crusade 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Exacty ZERO. Because it didn't happen that way. It's just another off-the-wall conspiracy theory. I've seen the videos and they only prove that the commentator has no idea what he is talking about.
Have a look at those programs on Discovery and TLC that cover explosive demolition of buildings. You'll immediately notice one thing: Tall buildings are blown from the bottom up, not the top down.
And of the relatively few people who have the expertise in doing this work, NONE of them would EVER consent to setting charges in an occupied building.
Please don't be suckered by these idiots that make these absurd claims. They're little different from the whackos that claim to be the Son of Sam killer or other lunatics that are looking for attention.
BTW, you're so off-the-wall that you didn't even notice that you are posting this idiocy in the Renting & Real Estate area! Get a LIFE, OK??!
2006-08-19 04:41:11 · answer #2 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do believe the towers were brought down my what is called a 'controlled demolition....Anyone that has any sense can see it was a controlled demo...
A controlled demolition would have exploded debris horizontally at a rapid rate. A controlled demolition would also explain the fine, pulverized concrete powder, whereas pancaking floors would leave chunks of concrete. Controlled demolition would also explain the seismic evidence recorded nearby of two small earthquakes, each just before one of the Twin Towers collapsed. And finally, controlled demolition would explain why two steel skyscrapers, all collapsed in essentially the same way.
The official story maintains that fires weakened the buildings. Jet fuel supposedly burned so hot it began to melt the steel columns supporting the towers. But steel-framed skyscrapers have never collapsed from fire, since they're built from steel that doesn't melt below 2750 degrees Fahrenheit. No fuel, not even jet fuel, which is really just refined kerosene, will burn hotter than 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.
It was most definitely a 'controlled demolition'.
2006-08-19 16:31:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's just plain nuts!
What next, so now the people in the buildings committed suicide?
And the fully fueled planes were an illusion?
Or the terrorists planted explosives to be set off by the planes crashing? Give me a break!
2006-08-19 05:24:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How many people know it wasn't the planes? Clearly not many since EVERYTHING shows that it was. If you have proof that it was something else, Yahoo Answers is not where you should be. If you want to spread the word, talk to the media. Otherwise try to accept the fact that not everything is a conspiracy.
2006-08-19 04:35:29 · answer #5 · answered by danl747 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who set off the explosives? The Jews? Bush? Pray Tell.
Regards
2006-08-19 21:49:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rodney,
I hate to say it but your an idiot. I had friends who passed in that chaotic tragedy. I really dont understand where you get off saying some assinine statement like that. Im hoping your on drugs to think of something like that so then at least you have an excuse for your own pure stupidity!
2006-08-19 17:10:22 · answer #7 · answered by joelaraia03 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one knows, and no one can prove it, because it didn't happen with explosives. Anyone who believes it did is border line Moron.
2006-08-19 04:35:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah.....and we never walked on the moon, and Elvis is still in the building....and Area 51......OOOh scary
2006-08-19 05:01:27 · answer #9 · answered by Paula M 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nonesense! Enough with the crazy conspiracy theories. Enough!
2006-08-19 04:34:49 · answer #10 · answered by EDDie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋