Representative republic.
We're not an oligarchy, there are no class or monetary requirements to get into congress or the presidency. While that helps, there are many examples of porrer people being elected.
We're not totalitarian, or else the NY Times would not be permitted to reveal classified information in the paper. I a totalitarian state they all would have been sent away even before publishing the information.
I might agree that there are those whose policy desires, if enacted, would render this country a totalitarian oligarchy, at least de facto if not de jure. But institutionally and structurally, we are a representative republic, albeit one with a population of 300 million and the attendant bureacracy.
2006-08-19 03:42:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Charles D 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Representative Federal Republic. It won't become a totalitarian oligarchy anytime soon.
2006-08-19 03:48:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Troll Alert! ok, i am going to chew. the united states has been a Republic in view that 1789. till 1840, in ordinary words white male landowners could vote and there have been 2 hundred small organizations with out precise to own inventory in different organizations. In 1886 the ultimate courtroom ruled organizations were "organic persons" entitled to danger-free practices less than the bill of rights*. through 1919 ninety% of the U. S. inhabitants worked for organizations. organizations are purely businesses composed of persons. they could't vote for representatives, yet company welfare and man or woman welfare overlap to a pair degree because of possession, employment, and their impact on the monetary equipment. Representatives have a responsibility to do what's brilliant for the country, so in the journey that they trust that balloting for a level assisting a employer will be of benefit to their consituents, they're honor certain to take action. campaign financing regulations do not dodge representatives from accepting contributions from organizations, yet they ought to divulge them so the electorate can choose no matter if their representatives have fashionable a employer for valid motives or were unduly prompted through their contributions. the in ordinary words thanks to get rid of this impact is to enact complete public financing for elected officials and frankly, the way they spend money, we can not have the funds for it.
2016-11-30 19:49:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dispite the Dumbya Coup the USA is neither a representitive republic nor YET totalitarian. Dumbya is working to scrap the Constition for a AUTHORITARIAN state.
2006-08-19 08:29:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
At this time we are a representative republic.
2006-08-19 03:44:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oligarchy for sure.
We love our Plutocrats
Go big Red Go
2006-08-19 03:59:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by 43 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
representative republic
2006-08-19 03:42:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-08-19 03:43:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by lost&confused 5
·
0⤊
1⤋