English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

aristotle, the Greek philosopher contributed many philosophies, however, many other philosophers contrasted his statement

2006-08-19 03:31:24 · 2 answers · asked by yanelli 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

2 answers

Well, I'm not entirely well-versed in this area... but I believe... Socrates would have not agreed with some of Aristotle's many philosophies. Aristotle was a disciple of Socrates, but did not believe in all of Socrates' teachings. "Socrates believed that the best way for people to live was to focus on self-development rather than the pursuit of material wealth. (Gross 2)." Socrates' philosophy, in contrast to Aristotle's philosophy, which was essentially: "Aristotle contended that happiness could not be found only in pleasure or only in fame and honor. He finally finds happiness "by ascertaining the specific function of man". But what is this function that will bring happiness? To determine this, Aristotle analyzed the soul and found it to have three parts: the Nutritive Soul (plants, animals and humans), the Perceptive Soul (animals and humans) and the Rational Soul (humans only). Thus, a human's function is to do what makes it human, to be good at what sets it apart from everything else: the ability to reason or Nous. A person that does this is the happiest because they are fulfilling their purpose or nature as found in the rational soul. Depending on how well they did this, Aristotle said people belonged to one of four categories: the Virtuous, the Continent, the Incontinent and the Vicious." "Socrates seems to have often said that his wisdom was limited to an awareness of his own ignorance. Socrates may have believed that wrongdoing was a consequence of ignorance, that those who did wrong knew no better. The one thing Socrates consistently claimed to have knowledge of was "the art of love" which he connected with the concept of "the love of wisdom", i.e., philosophy. He never actually claimed to be wise, only to understand the path that a lover of wisdom must take in pursuing it. It is debatable whether Socrates believed that humans (as opposed to gods like Apollo) could actually become wise."

Contrast their philosophies. (Sorry, I did not paraphrase because I thought it would sound better if I left it as is, and not change it to laymen's terms. Cited at the bottom in "sources")


"Aristotle has been criticised on several grounds.

His analysis of procreation is frequently criticised on the grounds that it presupposes an active, ensouling masculine element bringing life to an inert, passive, lumpen female element; it is on these grounds that some feminist critics refer to Aristotle as a misogynist.
At times, the objections that Aristotle raises against the arguments of his own teacher, Plato, appear to rely on faulty interpretations of those arguments.
Although Aristotle advised, against Plato, that knowledge of the world could only be obtained through experience, he frequently failed to take his own advice. Aristotle conducted projects of careful empirical investigation, but often drifted into abstract logical reasoning, with the result that his work was littered with conclusions that were not supported by empirical evidence: for example, his assertion that objects of different mass fall at different speeds under gravity, which was later refuted by John Philoponus (credit is often given to Galileo, even though Philoponus lived centuries earlier).
In the Middle Ages, roughly from the 12th century to the 15th century, the philosophy of Aristotle became firmly established dogma. Although Aristotle himself was far from dogmatic in his approach to philosophical inquiry, two aspects of his philosophy might have assisted its transformation into dogma. His works were wide-ranging and systematic so that they could give the impression that no significant matter had been left unsettled. He was also much less inclined to employ the skeptical methods of his predecessors, Socrates and Plato.
Some academics have suggested that Aristotle was unaware of much of the current science of his own time."

--this excerpt was taken verbatim from the site listed below.

Hopefully this helps somewhat.

2006-08-19 23:04:11 · answer #1 · answered by Zyxxin 3 · 0 0

No one is going to answer, I googled it nothing came up.

2006-08-19 03:41:18 · answer #2 · answered by Said 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers