think about it. No woman wants to see her son go to war. What if every country was run by a mother.. do you think it could work? why or why not?
2006-08-19 03:03:29 · 16 answers · asked by kangaroo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
It might be good after all we have had female mayors and governors and most everything else. One thing is for sure it would be different because women have different priorities than men. I think it would be ok, just look women have been the head of government in many countries so far, what about Margaret Thatcher she was ok. Maybe thats what we need, could a woman finally clean up this corrupt government and surely a woman would think of doing things here at home first instead of all this foriegn crap we do, anyways it couldn't be as bad as Bush.
2006-08-19 03:35:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well as usual the males have proven just how stupid they really are by the answers they gave so far.
If this country as well as other countries were governed by women we might all have a chance to live in peace and not war as we have already done and are still doing with another male in office.
I guess men don't want to live in peace or they wouldn't have given those stupid answers that they left for your question.
With men thinking like this we may never be given the chance to find out what it would be like to have a woman run this country or any other country now would we?
I think it would work but first we need the strongest duck tape just to keep shut the mouths of all those really stupid males who think they know more then any woman. It's men like this that will always keep countries in war and not peace.
Where are all those smart men who will take this country as well as every other country and declare peace and not war anyway?
Now we really should get women into office and keep them there because look where we are now and all we've ever had were men in office and war.
2006-08-19 10:18:45 · answer #2 · answered by fedupmoma 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Some women do want to see their sons go to war. BUT in general if the world were run by women, I think there wouldn't be any war. At least not in the way we think of war. There would certainly be a lot more summits and what-not. I think the world would be different but not necessarily better. We need better leaders, both male and female.
2006-08-19 10:11:03 · answer #3 · answered by Eugena 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Regardless of the elected leaders, the world is pretty much run by women. At least that has been my experience
2006-08-19 10:09:10 · answer #4 · answered by Peter G 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Based on my experience, women who are too hungry to lead always screws things up. while the truly wise ladies often prefers to remain in the background. i do approve of having female leaders, it would do much to reduce aggression n promote harmony in the environment. but i hope the world will open their eyes when electing leaders.
2006-08-19 10:19:20 · answer #5 · answered by Historymaker 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It would be no better.I'm a woman,and in our state(MI) we have a female(use that word loosely,she's more like a witch)and she's done more damage in her short tenure than many males have done in the past 20 years!
2006-08-19 14:50:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
what if the world was ran by those militant butch lesbians? Would the sons still go to war?
2006-08-19 10:08:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
we would go to war once a month and talk about it for the other three weeks
2006-08-19 10:12:55 · answer #8 · answered by tripledigit 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It'd be a great place for 28 days, but then the monthly bill would come and there'd be hell to pay!!
2006-08-19 10:09:29 · answer #9 · answered by daspook19 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hopefully a little bit kinder, and gentler, but there's no guarantee.
2006-08-19 10:10:51 · answer #10 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋