Hilary- No reverse carpet bagger
McCain- Possible a moderate conservative with a slight liberal view
Powell-No because last I heard he doesn't like politics ;-)
2006-08-19 02:00:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
None of the above. Clinton already was President for 8 years, even the senior cabinet members have admitted this. Bill was the dummy and Hillary was the power. John McCain is too not right. I do not think that Colin Powell would even run. I would prefer some non political team to vote for. I am tired of the two machines that control our politics. All candidates should run as independents.
2006-08-19 02:03:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by andy 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, we already know what a horrid job the Clintons did. So she's out of the running. I'd have to say Mccain. I can't see Powell running, but it would be a good race I believe. I really don't think our country could withstand another stint of the Clinton agenda. It's bad enough for 8 years we were on a slippery slope going nowhere but down with the two of them screwing everything up at every turn.
2006-08-19 02:07:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by damond h 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton, she is a strong, intelligent woman not afraid to stand up for what is right. She would have an excellant adviser in her husband, he was the last legally elected president. He was also the most successful at the job of running the country in over 40 years.
2006-08-19 02:20:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
This may sound odd coming from a liberal Democrat,but Id like to see a mixed ticket of Clinton and McCain,I respect them both .You speak of Clinton as being "a power hungry woman" what politicians isn't hungry for the power to run this country correctly ,all politician's are "power hungry"
It depends on each person what power means to them.
Power to help this country regain the respect of the world.power to undo the damage done by the previous administration or power to plunge our country into a un popular and un winnable war as Bush has done in his quest of power.I want a strong person running this country ,one devoid of ties to any religious bible thumping hypocrites,Clinton is that strong person,all the traits people dislike in her as a women are all the same traits you praise in a man.Think out side the box for once in your life.and McCain is a man I respect but would not vote for alone for president because he is a republican ,but if it were possible I would vote for Clinton for president with McCain as vice president.
Get out the Vote in Nov.mid term elections....true blue
2006-08-19 02:20:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
i'd vote for a regulation that made blasphemy unlawful. The penalty for this became into stoning in Leviticus 24:13-sixteen and in some international locations this has been outlawed. unquestionably all our rules would desire to approximate biblical rules. as quickly as we don't have a conventional and then can base our rules, then each and every thing will ultimately be arbitrary and on occasion against our writer. If abortion have been made criminal, then the abortionist has the spectacular to terminate you in the womb. as subsequently the 6th commandment: "thou shalt no longer kill, " many precious human beings have survived the womb." whilst human life is valued, scientific professional-assisted suicide and mercy-killing would decreased. whilst God rules are valued racial discrimination will cut back as a results of fact Genesis a million:26 publicizes all women and adult males persons are made in the image and likeness of God. a lot of our rules are patented after biblical regulation or maybe the form is predicated upon the rule of thumb of regulation and Christian concepts.
2016-10-02 06:58:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd vote for Powell in that after the tumultuous and very divisive Presidency of George W. I htink he'd have the best chance of healing some of the very deep divides that are apparent in US society now.
Clinton would make a good president, but the Republican party act like a catholic priest in the presence of a demon when they hear the name. She'd probably win, but it would divide and segment the US even more at this time.
McCain just doesn't stand up to scrutiny. He's a good man, but he has too many personal demons and despite what Bush did to him during 2000 he turned around and supported him in order to get the chance in 2008. I can understand political expediency, but when somebody goes after you and your reputation in the dirty manner which Bush and co went after McCain, I wouldn't support him in anything, much less be seen as supporting him wholeheartedly. That leaves a big ethical questionmark over him, just how far will he be willing to go?
Powell is ethically stronger and he has the credentials and history to really be a great president. For obvious reasons he'd get the support of the African-American and other ethnic (people of colour) groups, who are traditionally democratic stalwarts; and as he is an avowed Republican he would get their support as well.
2006-08-19 02:14:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by zubinlcooper 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
I remember too many things about Hillary Clinton to ever vote for her. This was before Bill Clinton ever became President, and later. She mainly got elected, I personally think because everyone felt sorry for her because of Bill Clinton's infidelities.
He and All Gore were responsible for demanding that certain prisoners that Israel had be freed. They were the same ones who committed the crime of 9/11. Think about it.
None of them truly appeal to me, but if I had to vote for someone, it would be Colin Powell. He has the best grasp of world politics. and has seen first hand what is going on in the middle east.
I won't even discuss John McCain.
2006-08-19 02:08:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by virgiinia r 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
There is no contest. Jeb Bush has already been chosen as the next president. The RNC will give him the job at the last minute.
I'm thinking someone like Chaney will win the nomination at the convention then withdraw at the last moment. Then the RNC will put Jeb in. The late placement will cut the anti Bush oppositions, time to slander Jeb.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-19 03:16:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by 43 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton, because she pretty much ran the white house when her old man was in office and she did a darn good job. Just cause her hubby couldn't keep his peter in his pants is no reason to punish her.
2006-08-19 01:59:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by messijessi 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Collin Powell! Da!
2006-08-19 02:13:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋