can the british public reclaim their own government?

Question

Ifeel if every man and woman in Britain was compelled to vote we would get the government we deserved .

Answer 1

You have no chance, this government has even stolen the country from the crown

Answer 2

The present method of governing Britain is out of date


My idea is that we need a complete revamp in government. Not just change the people, but completely change the way we think about government.
When the current system of democracy was created the population of England was about a sixth of what it is now. So there were 659 MPs for about 10 million people, being a representation ratio of about 15000 to 1.

Now, we have 646 MPs, and about 60 million people giving a representation factor of about 93,000 to one.

So each person's representation has reduced by around 600%.
In other words, you now get about one sixth of the representation that a citizen in 1801 got. Another way of looking at this is to say that, in order to have the same level of representation that we had in 1801, we would need 3876 MPs.
This is obviously ludicrous. and is absolute evidence of a need for a change.

As the population has increased so dramatically, then the effectiveness and fairness of a central government has reduced.
What we now need is an increase in the power of local government, and a reduction in the power of central government.
I propose that we should bring back something akin to the parish councils. We should have constituencies of a maximum of 500 families. These constituencies should have total control over the lives of its constituents, with no interference from outside, They must provide all of their own facilities such as school, health care, pensions, police, ar anything which they feel that they need.
If they feel that they are too small for a particular project or service, then they negotiate with nearby constituencies to make suitable arrangements. There would be no higher level arbitrator. Full responsibility would rest at the local level.

The benefits of this are enormous. Firstly, everybody would know everybody else within a constituency, so when a problem arises it would be easy to get to the source, because it would be to everyone's benefit to do so. This alone would reduce terrorism and serious crime to a minimum. A sort of neighbourhood watch scheme in which everybody takes full part, and makes the decisions. The money presently spent on taxes, most of which disappears in red tape, civil servants' and MPs' salaries, waging war, and hundreds of other expenses from which the average citizen receives no benefit whatsoever, would be spent on directly benefiting the community, on projects voted for by the community.
It is most likely that taxes could be reduced to a fraction of what is presently paid, because all wastage would be readily identified. Everybody would participate in their own government, because they would be able to understand it, and would have a real voice.
There would be no need for secret services, or secrets of any kind, saving another fortune, and removing another load of confusion.

I'm sure you can identify many other benefits, and I'm also sure that any disadvantages could quickly be overcome.

But of course for all this to happen, we must have a government which has this idea in its manifesto, the public must accept the idea, and the party with this advanced manifesto must win.
If there was sufficient publicity, and the public liked the idea, it wouldn't be too difficult, because the first and only job of the new government would be to decide the new constituencies, and hold a new election, prior to the permanent disolution of parliament.

Answer 3

I agree, however since voting is optional, you take what you get,
In Brazil voting is compulsory but a very large number of voters
cannot read or write. Result: promises made during campaigns
usually elect more incompetent congressmen than honest guys.
So I think you must take into account the country that is voting.
In Britain, I have no doubts that those who vote know how to read
and write and know what it is all about.

Answer 4

I feel not
I wont be made to vote
I will only ever vote, if i could do so not thinking my actions would not har others.

This might happen if a certain person, whom broke the geneva convention, was sent to prison for war crimes.

Anyone who voted for labour in the last election, i feel is personally responsible, if even only in a small way, for the way in Iraq.

We should stop voting, it is the only way, once they can no longer say they are democratically elected, what will they do. I say give the whole shebang to the queen, and i dont even like the royals..

Once again stop voting, if the process becomes a sham, and afew thousand votes, made you pm, we would have to scrap the whole lousy system..

Answer 5

Of course we can get a government of our choice. However, i also believe that if you dont vote, you dont have a right to whinge.

Labour won the election, due to the fact they had the largest minority. Bad, but thats how it works if people are apathetic.


NB
Andy, or course Rousseau would say that, hes French. The republic isnt much better, is it really?

Nicekindaguy, get real. If its anything liek the racist thugs in the BNP, or even the pathetic Lib Dems, you've seriously got a screw lose

Answer 6

i imagine you probably did not opt to take heed to this, yet truthfully, i really do have self assurance it is because a lot less women human beings are sitting at abode taking care of the youngsters, and out in the artwork position, and do not ought to post with an rather good type of crapola anymore, so that they don't! men might want to get a touch more effective "domesticated" even as they're older, and probably some women human beings that marry previous men even as they're youthful are having 2d options even as they're more effective mature, and the guy receives a lot older too. Over all, inspite of the undeniable fact that, i imagine guys have continually been a lot less in all probability to be the single to record for divorce. they could somewhat have their cake and devour it too. properly, that's no longer cuttin' it with us Broads anymore, because we cookies are transforming into plenty smarter!

Answer 7

The brtish people will never ever reclaim the govt. coz they are all a bunch of wankers and most politicians are so full of shite like political correctness that they will prefer to have the asses of common folk bombed instead of talking their mind and condemning the muslim "Vote" the so called people to have elected tony and midless, senseless group of nutters and political blood sucking ticks.

Answer 8

In England their are three type's of people.The first being a gutless, spineless, snivelling headnodder.......the second is a cringing,cowardly, wretch that dithers as they look to other people for opinion ......the third is the warrior that this country has produced for thousands of years.Now this group is my group. they are represented by a ' certain ' party which I believe is the fastest growing in membership since the commies of the Labour party got in or the chinless snotty toffs Tories.What one of these three are you ????

Answer 9

Every 5 years they have the opportunity. The next day, their democracy dies for another 5 years. Rousseau said that long ago.

"The English think they are free, but they are so only during the election of members of Parliament. Afterwards they are slaves, they are nothing. During the brief moment of their liberty, the use which they make of it merits well that they should lose it."

Answer 10

All governments promise the earth before election, but never seem to deliver,
but always seem to feather their own nest or bed as it may be with money
or sexual favours.How ever hard they try, world disasters and wars seem to
mar the way.

Answer 11

Sorry to tell you this but you HAVE the government you deserve.

Read 1 Samual in the bible. It is about the first king of Israel, Saul.
They asked for a king like the other nations and well.. they got one!