honestly I think it is a lil of both. you cannot feel loss without missing what isn't there anymore. every death is a tradgedy (outside murderers and rapists and child molesters). We grieve because we cared about that person and we will miss them, so in a sense it is our loss. it is a never ending circle, but in the end it is balance. you cannot have one without the other.
2006-08-18 21:58:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by sweetangel20_04 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
grieving because the person's dead ?
I Think That Would Be Determined
To Some Extent
Upon The Circumstances Of The Death In Question
As An Example
Its Been Said
Do Not Mourn The Death
Instead, Celebrate The Life
The Death Of An Infant Doesnt Give Much Wiggle Room
Leaves Much Reason To Mourn
An Elderly Person That Has Lived A Long, Rich Life
And Left The Impression Of Good Memories
On Many, Many People
Leaves Much Reason For Celebration
grieving over our loss ?
Goes With The Territory In Any Circumstance
Its Not Selfish
Its Human
Hope This Helps
2006-08-18 21:56:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
you at the prompt are not the purely one, Launi. not particular about all and sundry else, even if it is also taken me a lengthy time period, like years, to get over my a number of my canines' deaths. and that i tear up back if i imagine about them too not user-friendly. (excuse me ... getting some tissues).(thanks alot ;D) i have spent a large number of time bawling in my vehicle. people ask what's incorrect, it truly is embarrassing to assert i'm disenchanted over the canines. some people ask 'nevertheless'? It became not user-friendly to lose my father, and awaken each day wondering something turned right into somewhat off, and then remembering. It became surreal that existence went on, yet all of us shared that grief. I grieved for my canines on my own. i do not recognize if it truly is the prevalent of our bond or what. What makes me even more beneficial unhappy is understanding that because the years bypass i am going to forget them a touch. My female is 6 now, and that i only won't be able to imagine about it.
2016-11-05 03:52:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by treiber 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say both. I grieve because that person (or animal) has ceased to be. They will never again be able to experience the wonderful things of life. But yes, I also grieve because I no longer have that person (or animal) in my life.
2006-08-18 21:58:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Spookshow Baby 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes. the term 'grieving' is the process a person goes through when they have suffered a substantial and painful loss. so if your father dies and you grieve his loss, you are grieving for your own personal loss.
however, this does not mean to say that we cannot feel sadness or regret over another person's death--but those feelings are not really grieving.
2006-08-19 00:03:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by sardines packed in a can 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I do not think this to b true. We are grieving as much for the dead person as for the gr8 loss he/she has caused us.
2006-08-18 22:02:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
not always.ppl grieve about the loss of the dead person.how he/she didnt get a full life.its not always our own loss
2006-08-18 22:03:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by sharath1186 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Good question, But i guess people grive coz they miss the person. they grive because they think that person deserved to live on, They grive cos they loved the person. So its not like you are completely selfish grieving for your own loss.
2006-08-18 21:56:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Missy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think it's some of both, which is perfectly reasonable; after all, both the dead person, and the survivor, have lost something precious.
2006-08-19 08:23:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Keither 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
we grieve b'coz we miss that person . In a sense you right
2006-08-18 22:01:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by archa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋