pro life
2006-08-18 17:18:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Pro life all the way. There is no reason or excuse for killing a baby. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to pass judgment, because I kno that there are a lot of weoent out there having abourtions everyday. The shame is that these women are conned into believing that there is no other option when indeed there is. There is always adoption, if a woman gets prignane and has a dead beat dad for a boyfrirnd. This is America, ther is always a choice. Abortion is NEVER the answer. It leaves you tormented for the rest of your life, and I am saying this because I have taled with women whom have had it done nd they wished they never did it, because it's a constant nightmare you can never wake up from. Once it's done, it's done, and there is no turning back, so think twice before doing soemthing that can and will ruin your life. Use a condom, or better yet abstain! A lot of young girls and women would be a hell of a lot better off if they would keep their pants on and their legs closed! Again, I am not passing judgement, I'm just telling it like it is.
2006-08-19 00:30:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
To be pro-choice is to be pro-life, of course.
To oppose women's freedom of reproductive choice is to be ignorant, foolish, and destructive of things that make life valuable. The religious grounds most people give are trumped up, as the Christian Tradition (including the Bible) has nothing to say about the medical termination of pregnancy.
There are many ignorant and foolish people running around, most of whom do not even realize how foolish and ignorant they are. These religious anti-abortionists are among the most bothersome. They like to call themselves :"pro-life," but in fact they are destroying life, in the truest sense.
Of course a woman has the right to a safe, legal abortion if she has been abandoned or for some reason cannot support her child, if her life is in danger from childbirth, or if there is medical evidence the child will not be whole. To claim otherwise, especially on "religious" grounds is to celebrate ignorance and foolishness.
That doesn't mean anyone thinks abortion is a neat idea and everyone ought to have one. Nobody thinks that, and to think that would also be ignorant and foolish. But the stupid idea that there should be laws limiting a woman's freedom to control her own reproductive tract is far, far worse.
Terminating a pregnancy is not "killing a baby," and if you think so, you are mentally ill. Or just dumb.
Again, to be pro-choice is to be pro-life.
2006-08-19 00:33:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by aviophage 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Pro choice
2006-08-19 00:19:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by lockesmith 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
I am pro life. A woman lays claim that it is her body, and she is correct! She needs to protect it and not wait on someone else to do it for her! Thats called responsibility! Not human, it will be unless you lay down with barnyard animals! All of it is human, just not formed yet, if it was a human you had sex with. I've always been taught to take responsibiltiy befor the act, not to wait and find a cheap way out. Some thing you will remember for the rest of your life!
2006-08-19 00:36:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pro choice.
What angers me most about the anti-choice stance is the idea that every woman should have to accept pregnancy/motherhood
even if her most diligent practice of birth control fails. This DOES happen often, despite the propaganda to the contrary.
96% of the people on death row were unwanted kids. Were all these kids adoptable and their selfish parents didn't send them to an upper class family? Don't kid yourself. In fact, there's a theory that the drop in the crime rate in many areas is due to the availability of abortion since 1973. People who couldn't afford to bring a kid into a less than desirable life chose not to.
And, the fact is that countries where woman can control the number of children they bear have a higher standard of living for all, and lower rates of domestic abuse.
The bottom line is that NO ONE should have to be pregnant if they don't want to be. I fully support anyone who does want to have kids, although I'd prefer that my tax dollars aren't used to support them.
God gave us free will so that we could make difficult decisions by considering all factors. And an acorn is not an oak tree.
2006-08-19 00:35:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cluny Brown 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
pro life...be responsible enough to not have unprotected sex. Abortion is not a good form of birth control because you just didn't feel like being responsible. In extreme circumstances where the mother or the baby are in danger maybe but not as a form of birth control when using sex as a recreational sport and then not wanting the responsibilty for your carelessness. WRONG
2006-08-19 00:35:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by JustWant2B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
pro life
2006-08-22 10:49:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
pro life
2006-08-19 18:32:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anry 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
pro life
2006-08-19 05:40:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by < Roger That > 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was pro-life, until my daughter grew up. I don't want her stuck with some loser who's gonna knock her up & leave. Plus when I started having health problems , the last thing I'd need is a pregnancy. So now I'm pro choice.
After my 5th baby, I was clipped & snipped
2006-08-19 00:37:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by Ruthie1959 6
·
1⤊
0⤋