English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-18 16:43:51 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

16 answers

The Undertaker proves he is still a contender baby!

2006-08-18 16:56:20 · answer #1 · answered by bewitched28 3 · 1 0

Yes I do think it is fair that the undertaker won the match over khali the undertaker is back and show khali who is boss this time it was a great match and I am glad he won.

2006-08-18 19:54:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

Ofcourse it was fair I mean Undertaker is sooooo much better than khali. Khaliis like huge but he stinks against the undertaker!!!

2006-08-18 16:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by Kitten 1 · 1 0

Of course man, Khali couldn't beat an egg

2006-08-18 16:48:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course.It's a last man standing dude.You can use like weapon and stuff.Why you ask that question dude? You wanted Khali to win?

2006-08-18 16:50:17 · answer #5 · answered by LA Streets2007 2 · 0 0

It was a last man standing match how could it NOT be fair?

2006-08-18 16:50:43 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Yes, absolutely.

2006-08-19 15:33:43 · answer #7 · answered by Dusty 7 · 0 0

Yes it was fair

2006-08-18 18:05:31 · answer #8 · answered by clifton_woodruff 4 · 0 0

RULE 1 IS BEAT YOUR OPPONENT TIL HE CANT GET UP BY A 10 COUNT.
NO OTHER RULES. ANYTHING GOES.
SO YES IT WAS FAIR.

2006-08-18 18:26:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Ofcourse it was. hopefully this now ends this sad fued and get Taker back to somebody who can actually perform.

2006-08-18 17:58:50 · answer #10 · answered by dyna_hd1 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers