The Undertaker proves he is still a contender baby!
2006-08-18 16:56:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by bewitched28 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes I do think it is fair that the undertaker won the match over khali the undertaker is back and show khali who is boss this time it was a great match and I am glad he won.
2006-08-18 19:54:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ofcourse it was fair I mean Undertaker is sooooo much better than khali. Khaliis like huge but he stinks against the undertaker!!!
2006-08-18 16:55:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kitten 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course man, Khali couldn't beat an egg
2006-08-18 16:48:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course.It's a last man standing dude.You can use like weapon and stuff.Why you ask that question dude? You wanted Khali to win?
2006-08-18 16:50:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by LA Streets2007 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was a last man standing match how could it NOT be fair?
2006-08-18 16:50:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, absolutely.
2006-08-19 15:33:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dusty 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it was fair
2006-08-18 18:05:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by clifton_woodruff 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
RULE 1 IS BEAT YOUR OPPONENT TIL HE CANT GET UP BY A 10 COUNT.
NO OTHER RULES. ANYTHING GOES.
SO YES IT WAS FAIR.
2006-08-18 18:26:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ofcourse it was. hopefully this now ends this sad fued and get Taker back to somebody who can actually perform.
2006-08-18 17:58:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by dyna_hd1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋