2006-08-18 15:40:24 · 15 answers · asked by lyndoe_emiwee 1 in Sports ➔ Baseball
the Reds whoott whoott! Love me some of that Freel and Dunn! Too bad they traded Austy and Felipe, they pretty much rocked my socks!
2006-08-18 17:30:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Cards. For one thing they have a 4 and 1/2 game lead. Neither one is that great but as bad as the Cards pitching has been the Reds are even worse.
2006-08-18 16:52:15 · answer #2 · answered by shominyyuspa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cards, Albert Pujols!
2006-08-18 16:32:00 · answer #3 · answered by Harley H 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Giants
2006-08-18 16:57:33 · answer #4 · answered by tk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why does all and sundry should be 'more beneficial effectual?" and then, more beneficial effectual at what??? for my area, it truly is a count number of opinion the determination of hair colour we adore in someone -I genuinely have black hair with some gray - and function colored it deep brown. My fiance' is bald - and that i like it!
2016-11-05 03:27:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cardinals.
2006-08-18 19:27:56 · answer #6 · answered by Mary* 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I couldn't pass this one up. The Cardinals by a wide margin
2006-08-18 18:42:40 · answer #7 · answered by Ricky Lee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cards... Their pitching is not good, but it certainly isnt horrible. Saying if we take away albert and rolen is like saying if we took Dunn and Griffey... you cant say things like that and pretend its a point...
2006-08-18 15:52:35 · answer #8 · answered by wdchen89 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THE REDS ARE BETTER. ST LOUIS AIN'T GOT NO PITCHING AND IF YOU TAKE AWAY SCOTT ROLEN AND ALBERT, THAT LINEUP AIN'T THAT GREAT.
2006-08-18 15:49:24 · answer #9 · answered by antonio d 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
boston red sox
2006-08-19 10:05:11 · answer #10 · answered by luckduck_luckyducky 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋