English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

then how could we possibly let Iraq move the WMD to Iran and not know? Shouldn't we have seen it??

2006-08-18 15:12:12 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

John- I was not aware that my guy Harold Ford was on that list.. That sux.. thanks..

2006-08-18 15:27:47 · update #1

10 answers

The U.S. used to have the best intelligence because they relied upon operatives that collected data firsthand. Now they rely on satellites and information gathered by their allies which can sometimes be incorrect and unreliable, but they act on the information they have then cover up the collateral damage.

2006-08-18 15:19:55 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0 1

They probably are in Syria but the best intelligence in the world is from Israel. They too thought the WMDs were still in Iraq.

However we gave them ample time to move the WMD since we drag out diplomacy for so long. It shouldn't be surprising to anyone as long as they had a place that would allow them to store the WMDs. I suspect they are probably destroyed by now.

2006-08-18 22:52:16 · answer #2 · answered by Raylene G. 4 · 0 0

It depends on what u mean by intelligence... actually not. Both r retarded. They cause a lot of violence but not necessarily against the right targets... Osama is having a ball somewhere... There r no WMDs and a force of 150,000 is lost in a desert not knowing how to return home.

2006-08-18 22:39:31 · answer #3 · answered by boogie man 4 · 0 1

How are we supposed to know? Intelligence is kept guarded, and of course our government is going to say we have the best intelligence agencies. I don't think you can get a valid answer to this question.

2006-08-18 22:28:39 · answer #4 · answered by maguire1202 4 · 0 0

I would say no, the United Kingdom as a great one, Isreal has a great one and the Vactican has a good one.

And of course the terrorist don't need one, they just have to watch cable TV

2006-08-18 22:19:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If we were really looking for them. . .

That wasn't the true reason for going into Iraq. If it were, then they would have had better intel. We went in to get Sadam. They got him. Now what???

2006-08-18 22:20:05 · answer #6 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0 1

What do you expect when we have cowboy running around DC yapping who knows what blind to how this Nation is falling apart and to the terror outside of it. I think he lost his mind somewhere back in time.

2006-08-18 22:21:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

We seen it. People tend to suffer from the "i don't remember that" syndrome

2006-08-18 22:23:25 · answer #8 · answered by John 3 · 0 0

Not really
just money.

2006-08-18 22:17:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

,At one time, but most certainly. not any more.

2006-08-18 22:30:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers