what did you think
2006-08-18 15:09:44 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It was so sad, I hope Wallace only said what he said becaue he was in fear of his life from him. If not Wallace should never be taken seriously again as a journalist.
2006-08-18 15:28:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
can't believe people saw wallace as sucking up - he is the consummate interviewer and was trying to get Ahm a mad in the head to talk. Did you see the one hour full version on C-Span?
my son was outraged that Wallace was so rude to the Pres. I just thought he was excellent at getting Ahmed to reveal himself. He's all about peace and love, you know, except for those IEDs!
The Pres. of Iran is very bright, and he's up to dealing with the West. That's important for us all to know. He's clearly no madman. When a reporter asks you if you know everything and tells you you look nice in your jacket, he is condenscending to you, not flattering you - he is trying to get you to make a fool of yourself by overreacting.
Wallace is a master at what he does. Too bad viewers here apparently just wanted him to convert the Pres or pillory him or something.
2006-08-19 09:19:15 · answer #2 · answered by cassandra 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Wallace was sucking up to the guy to get the interview.
Dispicable; Abaminejad is a nut case.
2006-08-18 22:33:34 · answer #3 · answered by n0witrytobeamused 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋