Why are you an idiot?
Oh wow, you called me the same thing I called you. I think I'll go cut myself.
The liberals want to negotiate. Yes, it's pointless, but they seem to think the terrorists have reasonable human sides to them (which they don't seem to have) and they try to appeal to that side and get them to stop attacking people. It's obviously proved futile thus far. There, I answered the question.
2006-08-18 14:34:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
They don't dude. You need to spin the dial on the radio and listen to some music or sports or even Dave Ramsey....you have had toxic levels of Rush-Hannity-ORiley.
The symptons are easy to identify....a break with logic, reasoning, reality. From your question, it appears you are suffering badly.
Look in all seriousness (if your question is serious), we Liberals don't want to talk to terrorists at all. We want them stopped as much as you do. We just think there are some smarter ways to do that. That's it.
We're on your side of the cage, so stop throwing monkey doodoo at us.
2006-08-18 21:36:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
If we just try to blow them up, we'll only fan the flames. Egypt and Israel had been fighting for the longest time. but the leaders of both countries got together to form a peace treaty by TALKING out their actions and ideas. Egypt is one of the only two countries in the middle east that has a peace treaty with Israel. And they got those treaties by PEACEFULLY talking out their actions.
2006-08-18 21:54:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by happyinblue 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do conservatives always wanna give the rich tax cuts and force me to pay 100 dollars for a bottle of arthritis medication, ya damn fool? Whose the terrorist again? I belive it's people like you.
2006-08-19 10:43:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by FootballFan1012 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well. . .
If it came down to talking to them or killing everyone around them, but NOT them, I would talk. Bush didn't talk, and look where we are today - in the middle of a war. A lot of good that fighting did. If Bush is going to go in there, he needs to go balls out.
2006-08-18 22:00:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They think they can compromise with them that they can reason with them....that by trying too understand them that they can change the terrorist ways of wanting too kill anyone who doesn't accept the warped lie of a religion called Islam.
2006-08-18 21:35:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by General Custer 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hey NYJets45 it was Reagan who funded the Afghanistan freedom fighters..typical liberal fool!
2006-08-18 21:49:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by michelle_az_22 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh goodness, why I am I talking to a Nimrod?
Guess it's fun to poke at you because you're so hopeless.
Where do you get these things?
Why aren't you educated? What happened to you as a child?
2006-08-18 21:41:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush can suck a big floppy donkey penis, i would rather have a president that gets head in his oval office instead of one that sits in a classroom while our country is being attacked
2006-08-18 21:42:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Big Daddy Cake 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
If they actually wanted to do something besides talk we couldn't really consider them liberals, now could we?
2006-08-18 21:42:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by shea_8705 5
·
0⤊
0⤋