Im not completly Anarchist. I just believe that the government shouldn't be involved in our life's as much as it is. Yes, I do believe it has some good, because it definitely does. So what's a way to explain this to someone?
2006-08-18 13:51:37 · 17 answers · asked by Ms.Beautiful 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
An anarchist believes that there should be no government at all.
A libertarian believes that government should be minimally involved in daily life, only to the extend necessary to provide infrastructure (road, emergency services, courts, law enforcement, defense).
And the term for someone who disagrees with what our current administration is doing is... an independent thinker.
2006-08-18 13:56:58 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
A Separatist. Even though a separatist usually belongs to a group.Unlike an anarchist.
Realistically, anarchist can't exist without a government.
2006-08-18 14:29:37 · answer #2 · answered by david g 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try to avoid any type of labeling of yourself, Ms. B. Others will more than make up for it anyway. I agree with your position, and feel that way myself. It's those of us who stand for freedom and independence who are misunderstood because we don't go along to get along.
Like the other guy said, anarchists want no government (which is a fair argument to me). You are an independent thinker, which is the opposite of a sheep whom most everyone esle is. Any existing political labels for your position would be unfitting and belittling because the powers that be have no use for your (and my) position, and make every attempt to marginalize it as radical or at the fringe.
2006-08-18 14:44:21 · answer #3 · answered by Lance 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
anarchist means you are against all forms of governmentt.the governmen NOW is supposed to be a republican form of government that protects the rights of the individual,it's not supposed to be a democracy, which is mob rule.someone who advocates small government which abides by the constitution that was designed to keep it from becoming oppressive, is a populist or true patriot.there is a very good news paper you may be interested in, you can find them on line.it's called the American free press.
2006-08-18 14:13:55 · answer #4 · answered by annoyingman69 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems that you want to explain your thoughts by putting a large issue into one word. To "explain", though, we dissect and take concepts and issues apart into their smallest possible components. Try writing just a list of words that describes the current government. Then, cluster those words into groups that mean about the same. In the process, the original "issue" becomes even clearer and in that clarity, you'll find all the truly helpful words that any of us need to describe this "fascist" "regime" of "plunderers". Good luck.
2006-08-18 14:07:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sounds like you are a Libertarian. There are many things the government does not have the right to be involved in. We have allowed as a society for years to have everything regulated.
2006-08-18 14:51:48 · answer #6 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tell them your a conservitive who wants a single ruler, not a bunch of agencies that do nothing but use tax dollars. Also say that you hate Liberals who think america should be for the people of the people and by the people, how stupid they are. That should make your case, plain as day.
2006-08-18 14:21:56 · answer #7 · answered by Marcus R. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rebel? Revolutionist?
2006-08-18 13:57:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Issue by issue. Are you a freelove type anarchist?
2006-08-19 14:27:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely pondering the 1st and maximum severe rule of libertarianism is the axiom of non-aggression, i might say it incredibly is the stupidest component everyone can say, by way of fact libertarianism is fervently adversarial to any form of involuntary servitude or coercion of any style.
2016-12-11 11:12:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋