2006-08-18 13:27:24 · 23 answers · asked by Peter 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There's no way to know. The law of averages would suggest that almost any other president would have higher approval ratings than the current president. But of course only half of the country voted for the clown in the first place.
2006-08-18 13:31:17 · answer #1 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Of course. Why is Bush unpopular? Katrina, for one, because he appointed a GOP yes-man, instead of a qualified individual. Clinton-Gore actually appointed QUALIFIED members to key positions.
Iraq. If Gore were president, we wouldn't even be there. If Kerry were president, it would still be a gigantic mess (and the GOP dopes would all be screaming that it was Kerry's fault), but the vast majority of Americans wouldn't be blaming Kerry for Bush's mess.
Budget. Clinton-Gore balanced the budget. No president has ever done a worse job of fiscal responsibility than Bush, so either president would be an improvement....
2006-08-18 14:17:14 · answer #2 · answered by lamoviemaven 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well I doubt if Al Gore would have gone to war without a plan, so I'd have to say he would. Mr Kerry on the other hand had no presidential qualifications so he would probably rate a zero.
2006-08-18 13:34:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Al Gore
2006-08-18 13:33:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I doubt it. I think neither would have had the guts to have taken on the terrorists but would have gone to the U. N. for a resolution after 9/11. If either had been declared president by the Florida Supreme Kangaroos or the Ohio Courts, we probaly would have already been attacked several more times by terrorists.
2006-08-18 13:41:22 · answer #5 · answered by bearbait7351 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think so.
They look like level-headed, peace loving people. I'm certain they would try their darndest to end all this Iraq nonsense.
I'm not too fond of Kerry, but I was definitely broken hearted when Gore "lost". Such a shame. He would've been a great president.
2006-08-18 13:37:46 · answer #6 · answered by deb 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Depends on where you asked the question , ratings polls are highly subjective and tend to be rather manipulative to get a certain response
2006-08-18 13:41:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Al Sharpton would have gotten higher approval ratings at this point! LOL
2006-08-18 13:42:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush is a f*cking idiot and retarded so he would prolly have picked a rock as a better president, but from me, Al Gore should have been president. he was the best.... and Bush is a motherucker *****
2006-08-18 13:33:51 · answer #9 · answered by peace 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
More than likely...no.
Al's presidency would be run by his wife Tipper and not him (she started the parent music resource center and tried to ban certain music)
John...Do we really need an "Aww shuck's" kinda guy for a president.
2006-08-18 13:34:43 · answer #10 · answered by zhadowlord 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋