If they had one team of the young stars 9 years or less in the NBA and the other 10 years or more they could seperate the talent. Then you would have Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, Carmelo Anthony against Kobe Bryant, Tim Duncan and Allen Iverson. Who would win?
2006-08-18 12:47:40 · 16 answers · asked by Marcus C 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
The older guys would win, for much the same reason as our young NBA players have been getting their heads handed to them in recent international competition (although this year's team is, hopefully, one of the better one's we've had lately)... Experience...
Besides, the players you mentioned as being 'older' (Duncan, Bryant and Iverson) are hardly 'over the hill....they're still quite dominant on the court.
That would be a fun and interesting game to watch, though! I'd love to see it!
2006-08-18 12:59:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They're all young "so-called" stars. Kobe & Tim Duncan are pretty good. The NBA has went down so much that I wouldn't really care who would win. Now if Larry Bird, Magic, Jordan, Pippin, Ewing, John Stockton... Now that would be a game. The new players are too concerned with sneaker deals & making rap videos. The old players would have never lost the Olympics to PR or any other country. Disgrace!
2006-08-18 14:25:00 · answer #2 · answered by borderlinediva@verizon.net 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The older stars would win because you would have all the members from the 1996 draft class playing aganst the younger stars. And that 96' class is the greatest draft class ever... it was loaded...
Kobe Bryant
Allen Iverson
Stephon Maurbury
Steve Nash
Shareef Abdur Rahim
Marcus Camby
Jermaine O'Neal
Ray Allen
Antoine Walker
Derek Fisher
Ben Wallace
2006-08-18 14:46:28 · answer #3 · answered by Dun Dun 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The older stars becuz the younger stars have only a handfull of good big men (most still have potential) and the older guys are all talent. Plus, experience definitely pays in the NBA>
2006-08-18 12:55:32 · answer #4 · answered by detroitsports_fan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The younger ones. They would be much more athletic and would not have problems with their bodies yet. Young legs really help in a game.
2006-08-20 04:51:49 · answer #5 · answered by #15mwu 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHAT IN THE HELL KIND OF DUMB *** QUESTION IS THAT.
IVERSON-- WHAT ABOUT JORDAN, PERKINS, SHAQ, WORTHY, OLAJUWON, MAGIC JOHNSON, KARL MALONE, CHARLES BARKELY, dr. j, CLYDE DREXLER.
KOBE IS 27 YEARS OF AGE--SO YOU THINK KOBE CAME INTO THE NBA AT AGE 17.
DUNCAN HAS BEEN PLAYING SINCE 97 IN THE NBA... THAT MAKES HIM IN FOR UNDER 10 YEARS
WHY DID YOU CALL THEM OLD PLAYERS.
IVERSON CAME INTO THE NBA IN 96, THAT MEANS HE HASNT PLAYED 10 YEARS....
SO-- GET ANOTHER DUMB QUESTION AND RESEARCH YOU FACTS--- YOU GEEK.
THE WINNER WOULD BE WHOEVER SCORED THE MOST POINTS.......... THINK ABOUT IT.
2006-08-18 16:23:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the youngs hav a chance. but if u wanna take deapth. then i think u hav to go with the old.
i think old can find 2 good players at each position. but the youngs cant get the same level from their 2nd player
2006-08-18 17:44:58 · answer #7 · answered by siripala 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The young guns, obviously. They would just crush them with their aggresiveness, offensive ability, and overall talent.
2006-08-18 13:30:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The veterans would win.
2006-08-18 12:54:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
older players
2006-08-21 23:47:57 · answer #10 · answered by deekayx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋