2006-08-18 12:33:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Ha ha ha! Samuel L Jackson will do ANYTHING. I think I'd rather watch paint dry than this movie.
2006-08-18 12:45:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought so too, but my friends saw it last night and loved it.
And Samuel L. Jackson didn't even read the script, he just saw the title and signed on to the role. I actually like the title. It makes you at least give attention to the movie whether you think it's stupid or not. I mean, if it were called Flights Bite or something like that, you probably wouldn't even think about it. Plus Snakes on a Plane has a nice ring to it.
2006-08-18 20:01:34 · answer #2 · answered by Broadway Baby 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quite seriously! It looks like "Fear Factor" meets "Airplane"... And the title reminds me of something George Lucas would think up -
What's next? Generic no-name brand labelling of movies like "Yet Another War Movie" or "Lame-duck Situation-Comedy Movie" or maybe they'll just number them like chinese takeout menu items... "Number 5" with a trailer for a "Number 11" on the side? I think Hollywood should fire the all these execs, writers and producers who have such atrophied imaginations - my ten year old could do better.
2006-08-18 19:55:20 · answer #3 · answered by Michael Darnell 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are really reaching with this one.... Snakes on a Plane? How about Cheetahs on a Drag Racer, or Poisonous Spiders on a Yacht?
2006-08-18 19:59:33 · answer #4 · answered by emmadropit 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the plot sounds awful and not the least bit interesting. I can see that movie being really boring and simple-minded, hence the title"Snakes on a Plane".
2006-08-18 22:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by Hairy Lime 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I can't believe Samuel L. Jackson did such a horrible movie.
2006-08-18 19:38:49 · answer #6 · answered by belle 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that movie looks retarded...the name of it makes me wanna b sick....wht kind of person would name a movie snakes on a plane??
2006-08-18 19:51:42 · answer #7 · answered by cheeseburger42593 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its supposed to look retarted its how they are going to get people to see it
2006-08-18 19:59:45 · answer #8 · answered by nicole 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i AGREE!!! it was a waste of money to make and it will be a waste of money to see
2006-08-18 20:05:24 · answer #9 · answered by benji3692000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it looks scary but good
2006-08-18 20:53:13 · answer #10 · answered by I_LOVE_2_SHOP! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋