Me, Hell yeah!
2006-08-18 12:00:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Angel 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, you're not the only one who's uncut, I am too; me along with about 80% of the world's male population, believe it or not. I think it's better than being cut, at the very least I've never had any problems with it.
5-minute jerks, can be either really quick or really long, depending on the mood and situation. If you're good, you can control yourself for almost an hour, or come and go in under 3 minutes. As long as you enjoy every second of it, it shouldn't matter how long it takes when you're by yourself.
2006-08-18 12:42:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by trebla_5 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless there is a medical or religious reason to be circumcised, i'm of the opinion that parents should leave it up to their children. If a parent just does it because they think it's better, I think that's wrong
I know someone who I am glad has decided she never wants to have kids. She's of the opinion that all men should be circumcised. I asked her what she'd do if she had a son and she said she'd have him circumcised. I asked her why and she said it's because she prefers and it wants to do it because she thinks it's cleaner because she prefers it, she thinks that all woman do.
The thing is, some parents are just lazy, and instead of teaching their sons to clean themselves properly, by pulling it back, they'd rather just have them circumcised.
Unless theirs a medical reason for it, it shouldn't be covered by public health cover either.
(BTW, to answer the question, I am circumcised. I was actually circumcised when I was 11 due to medical reasons. If it had been for any other reason, I'd be less happy with the situation, but I don't mind so much now.)
2006-08-18 13:13:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Shaun B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If this is a poll, well, then I pass, but you ask "who". All of us guys start out uncircumscized... but then there are religious beliefs related to primative sexual mutilations and thus the existence of circumcision. Faiths such as judism and islam dictate circumcision for males and some practices even extend it to young girls. Please try to understand that it is related to somewhat morbid sexual mutilations and has no justifiable health dictates. To be "proud" only means that you escaped the knife when just a few days old and your comrads didn't. It is NOT a condition that you can use to "judge" someone sexual prowess, it just "is" and probably not reversable....
2006-08-18 12:07:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by wearie 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am uncut and happy the choice wasn't made for me. Kinda messed up I think when parents cut their kids without letting them make the choice themself when they can weigh the consequences themselves.
2006-08-18 12:27:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by zooba 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My partner was never circumcised. And I'm glad. The sex feels better to me, and also, they've found that the foreskin that is removed during a circumcision (sp?) is full of precious nerve endings, so sex has more sensations for those with foreskin than for those without. Ha Ha! Good for you and good for me!
2006-08-18 12:06:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, my son is, but the point of jerking off is to make it last.
You don't go to a steak house and try and wolf down a Prime Rib dinner is 58.4 seconds.
You want to savor it.
2006-08-18 12:01:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I certainly am uncut... and yep, I am proud of it too!!!
lol
Lucky me!!!
; )
But... unlike you, I am not going to tell the world how long it take me to "get off".
lol
2006-08-18 12:09:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by boxergirl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
oooooo heyy sexxy email me hotbabe4real13@yahoo.com
luv
alyssa♥
2006-08-18 13:17:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ sexxxy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
not me and i wish i wasn't. going off is more of a mental thing for me.
2006-08-18 12:03:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by brakedown61301 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
isn't bad when a male isn't circumcised?for hygienic purposes?
2006-08-18 12:08:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋