Does anybody got any specific measurements?
2006-08-18 11:24:16 · 9 answers · asked by solipsistic 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
No but he had a good sized JOHNson.
2006-08-18 13:47:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If your question is serious, then this is the opportunity to point out to you that you must not fall into the trap of relating penis size to fame, power or any other masculine attributes as they are inconsequential, except in the porno film industry and related activities. Of "famous people", the member of Napoleon Bonaparte has been preserved, and by all measurements, not impressive. The mighty gorilla is endowed with a couple of inches..... Thus, the gist of your inquiry appears to try to make a relationship between fame and size, which is moot. And on a personal vein, you must not worry about your own endowment, it is what is between your ears (and in your heart) that counts, not what may be between your legs....
2006-08-18 18:49:39 · answer #2 · answered by wearie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he had a saint of a peter
2006-08-18 18:29:34 · answer #3 · answered by eve 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it was recorded...
The size of his Peter...
I also don't think the size of his Paul, his Luke, or his John were recorded.
2006-08-18 18:30:50 · answer #4 · answered by Automation Wizard 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LMAO I don't think anybody cared 2000 years ago.
2006-08-18 18:33:04 · answer #5 · answered by Carolina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hear Paul was pretty powerful too.
2006-08-18 18:30:04 · answer #6 · answered by starting over 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
RE-phrase your question
2006-08-18 18:29:15 · answer #7 · answered by young kim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dunno, but apparently he had a lot of female followers.
Maybe the one going to annoint him in the tomb were hoping rigormortis had set in.
2006-08-18 18:31:26 · answer #8 · answered by John F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could have asked him, but now you are going to Hell..............
2006-08-18 18:30:46 · answer #9 · answered by benndeb8 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋