who's more important?
(and when I refer to T.T.W.D. - I mean striclty THAT persona - not his whole career, which obviously eclipses pretty much anybody..)
2006-08-18 10:42:40 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
yeah to reiterate - I wasn't referring to the entire Bowie career - just the 'Duke' phase..
2006-08-18 11:02:25 · update #1
Oh, JUST that phase, huh?
Well then, I'll HAVE to go with Thin Lizzy, man! R.I.P: We all miss you Phil Lynott! I love you, man, COME BACK!
David Bowie's pretty cool as well, but The "Thin White Duke" phase really wasn't his greatest moment. Ziggy Stardust & Aladin Sane were more, shall I say, "Interesting".
2006-08-18 10:56:28 · answer #1 · answered by Lauren C.: Led-head 4 (∞) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Queen appointed William and Kate the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. William is a prince because his father is the son of a monarchy. the toddler of a prince is termed a prince or a princess on difficulty that the daddy is the son of a both the monarch or the heir to the monarchy. Diana replaced proper right into a princess because she married a prince, Prince Charles, who's son of Prince Phillip. William is a duke because he's less than the king. Prince and Duke are of equivalent stature. no human being is more effective than the distinctive one. someone might want to correctly be a prince and a duke mutually.
2016-11-26 00:40:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Def. Thin Lizzy
2006-08-18 10:47:15 · answer #3 · answered by Paula 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
David, obviously.
Regarding "importance", I don't see what you mean.
I don't see any artists idolizing Thin Lizzie.
2006-08-18 10:51:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
thin lizzy
2006-08-18 10:51:25 · answer #5 · answered by pappabear 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋