I don't believe him. He said he picked her up from school and took her home, but the killing occured Christmas Day. There is no school on Christmas Day. There are many other things he said that were improbable. Do you think he's telling part, all, or none of the truth? And why would he bring this up and put JonBenet's family through even more pain? Answer seriously.
2006-08-18 10:10:32 · 22 answers · asked by Aloofly Goofy 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
i think in so way he might have has some sexual assult with her at one point even if looking at a pic of her but i dont think he killed her. i agree with you.
2006-08-18 10:15:14 · answer #1 · answered by happygolucky 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he did it either. I think he is just starving for attention and this is his 15 minutes of fame. Nothing he has said in his "confession" matchs what has been released by the media so far. I also heard he was obcessed with other child victim Polly Klass..to the point where he wanted to write a book about her. I think this man is 2 fries and a McNugget short of a Happy Meal. But if he actually is the real killer, I'll volunteer to flip the switch on the electric chair or whatever the form of death is
2006-08-18 10:17:22 · answer #2 · answered by starikotasukinomiko 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't heard the details like you were describing... but if that is true, that definitely does put some doubt in my mind.
I did, however, read that his ex-wife said he was nearly obsessed with the Jon Benet Ramsey case, along with another missing girls case at the time. If he did not do it, then he may just be one of those freaky people who is missing a few marbles... who wants the attention of the media or some sort of close connection to Jon Benet. It is hard to logically explain or fathom why someone would say they were responsible for something they weren't, but it has happened before.
2006-08-18 10:17:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine it became an interloper.. possibly a foreigner or a member of a sadistic pedophilia crew. I say that in accordance to intuitive imaginative and prescient more beneficial than actual deduction. i recognize that what Patsy did in cleansing the evidence became extraordinarily suspicious and unhelpful, yet in her personal extraordinarily despairing concepts on the time, pondering how some people are type of conservative neatfreaks /niceknicks (not understanding if she became or not) i am going to genuinely see the cleansing taking position quote unquote innocently. it would want to also be a way of psychological denial of reality, hiding from the international. It turned right into a terrribly unhappy element for all.
2016-11-05 03:01:57 · answer #4 · answered by filonuk 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-as much as I'd like them to find her killer, I think he's just a nut job looking for his 15 minutes of fame. He's too vague.
And if he were emailing that professor like they said he was for four years, why turn him in now? I mean consequently, the professor has another book coming out on the Ramseys.
I think he should have been turned in four years ago.
The professor struck me as being a little off his rocker, too.
2006-08-18 11:55:43 · answer #5 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hear you there... But honestly I can't handle anymore of this story... The papers seems to love it... And again enough is enough.. I think her parents do need to know the truth.. But with all the facts and things going in different directions. and now this loser... Enough is Enough!
2006-08-18 10:19:03 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe him either. His story isn't matching up with the evidence. I think he is just some perverted wacko. Can you believe he was a teacher? That scares me. I don't think that he is telling the truth at all.
2006-08-18 10:17:41 · answer #7 · answered by Mia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think something is fishy about the whole confession . Supposedly he was emailing Jon Bennett's mother telling her how sorry he was before her passing , why didn't this come up at that time when he emailed her ? It all sounds funny to me , no i guess i don't believe it .
2006-08-18 10:19:07 · answer #8 · answered by cherdwum4 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i heard on the radio hes gurlfriend at the time said he was with her all day and night, plus he apparently had a huge obsession with the case all those years ago
2006-08-18 10:16:28 · answer #9 · answered by oz_gurl2005 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't.
But you are going to hear one long, whinning, very weird, poor-me, selfish story about this character and I think he is more interested in telling it than anything else...
Stay tuned!
2006-08-22 09:00:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋