So human beings have already set foot on the moon, just so you know.
Only three is a scientific claim.
A claim is only scientific if it is able to be tested.
Since two states that it's something we will "never" be able to measure or test, it can't be scientific.
Three however, we do all the time by watching other galaxies and noting funny things like strange spiral speeds, or higher than expected redshifts.
2006-08-18 10:14:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by ymingy@sbcglobal.net 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
That would be 2.
2006-08-18 10:15:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is a second mission which is planned by NASA in the near future . This time they will be more successful.
The laws of Physics are based on gravity what ever it was ever interpreted to be. In that sense they would apply to all galaxies wherever they are sitting(that is called a frame of reference).So if gravity mechanism is determined than we could understand how it applies to different galaxies. I was told that galaxies dont need a medium to travel just like light waves which are packet of waves.Since space is assumed to be a vacuum no medium could exist in a vaccum= I think,so I was told.
So all laws apply the same way in all the frame of references in the vaccum what ever that is.
2006-08-18 11:03:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by goring 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.) is unverifiable--how can you make a prediction for all time? It's a statement of belief without any backup.
2.) is unverifiable, therefore out of the realm of science.
3.) is conceivably verifiable. Is there room in the laws of physics as currently understood for this situation to occur?
I'd have to go with #3.
2006-08-18 10:24:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Benjamin N 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
in fact i believe none...
humans have already set foot on moon
if not now..may b in the future it can b deteceted...u just cant predict
as far as physics is conserned..all the basic laws r same watever the case may b..there is nothin special in milky way tat some laws dont hold true here..unless in exceptional cases when v may b able to find some extrodinary constituents...
2006-08-18 10:31:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We've already set foot on the Moon, who ever made up this test is stupid.
2006-08-18 10:42:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two
2006-08-18 10:13:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by _Kraygh_ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
3 is the one and only
It is also the longest possible answer, most of the time that's the one if you don't know it
2006-08-18 10:20:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by mc2_is_e 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Three.
2006-08-18 10:14:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow..im sorry but i dont understand any of this. maybe cause my science teacher sucks..
2006-08-18 10:15:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋