English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

His body lanuage says enough. His bearing is telling. And his bumbling of words can't be denied. If you can't make heads or tails of this, than you are blind.

Proof that George W.Bush had prior knowledge of the events of September 11th...(It's NOT "only" how he reacted (body language)to the question people(Skeptics).It's the FACT that NORAD was holding drills from 2 years before,to the day of 911 of the same EXACT event,and our "government" never heard of such a thing?
....

Amazing video to prove the above:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbQheEOXScE

2006-08-18 09:17:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Never going to prove it. And what's the point.

Of course NORAD was running scenarios about what happened if hijackers got ahold of a plane and tried to use it as a weapon. They've been making TV movies about that scenario for decades.

Besides, what's to be gained by trying to prove Bush was involved. Those who support him without question won't ever believe it. And those who might believe it can point to his own admissions for willful violation of federal law if they want to impeach him.

So, what's the point of arguing something that can never be proven.

2006-08-18 09:22:47 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 1

Of course Bush had advanced knowledge of 9/11. The Mossad had that and the CIA had that too. There was not a single Jew who died in the attack. In a city that consists of Jews all of a sudden not a single Jew shows up for work in the world trade center? If there is only a single person who believes that this is random, the person is certainly insane and has gone to the 'enchanted kingdom'.

Bush had advanced knowledge as well as FDR had advanced knowledge of Pearl Harbor. And both men needed an 'attack' like this to rally the public behind their desire for war.

Here is a nice quote that sums it up pretty well:
"Of course the people don’t want war. But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy. And it is always a simple matter to drag the people along weather it is a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leader. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them that they being attacked. And denounce the pacifist for a lack of patriotism and exposing the country to greater danger."

Herman Goering at the Nuremberg Trials

2006-08-18 16:38:21 · answer #2 · answered by The answer man 4 · 0 0

I think Bush is full of crap. I believe that the 9-11 attack was known to the president and they let it happen for their selfish needs.(Or they might have done it and blamed bin ladin) Once this attack took place.. it was a green light for the government to go into these Islamic countries just to get control of the oil. I dont think they really care about these people they just want to be able to control the oil. Bush Sr. was doing the same thing attacking islamic countries.. He is a bad president and I was stunned to see him be elected for a 2nd term. Bush needs to stop worrying about other countries and look at this counrty. With prices going up and cost of living going up ..it seems harder and harder for people to save.. most live paycheck to paycheck.. why cant he help these people... help Americans.. we will be more grateful. Stop getting American troops killed for selfish reasons..stop lieing to us. Who supplied guns and crap to these terrorist? Why do u think these terrorist have so much hatred because americans did bad to them...
He should be impreached. He is lieing to us..

2006-08-18 16:37:19 · answer #3 · answered by Arsh S 2 · 1 0

Do you think that Clinton was involved in 9/11?

2006-08-18 16:34:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know anyone who still believes anything Bush says anymore. If he says the sky is definitely blue, I'm still looking up to check.

2006-08-18 16:23:02 · answer #5 · answered by ratboy 7 · 0 0

Was Bush behind it in 1993 too?

2006-08-18 16:22:34 · answer #6 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0 1

http://www.newamericancentury.org/publicationsreports.htm

read rebuilding americas defenses you will find answers there to support your theory.

good luck!

2006-08-18 16:23:45 · answer #7 · answered by friskygimp 5 · 0 0

Nice. I'd seen that clip before, but not broken down the way this one was. Thanks.

2006-08-18 17:04:07 · answer #8 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers