is it the usa and isarel, iran, syria?
germany france and russia?? those 3 countries were doing fine with oil, but when the war was on they lost billions.
2006-08-18 09:12:09 · 17 answers · asked by Eshmun 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
(USA & isarel) because of oil
2006-08-18 09:22:07 · answer #1 · answered by mehdi_701 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Israel lobby in the USA The Israeli government prayed for the attack on Iraq, which has eliminated the strategic threat posed by Iraq. America was pushed into the war by a group of Neo-Conservatives, almost all of them Jews, who had a huge influence on the White House. In the past, some of them had acted as advisers to Binyamin Netanyahuwww.nowarforisrael.com/
2006-08-18 17:04:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Former Ba'athists who miss their former positions of prominence, supported by Saudi monies, and to a certain extent Syrian facilitation.
Alquaida does now support the insurgency in Iraq, and have stated such. They primarily support the Ba'athists.
Shia muslims who would like both payback and absolute power, supported by Iran and Lebanon. Lebanon's largest religious denomination is Maronite Christian with 40 percent of the population, Shia Islam with 35 percent of the population, and Sunni Islam with 20 percent of the population. 5 percent are other or unaffiliated. The Shias in Lebanon support the insurgency as a matter of self preservation, by uniting with Iran(predominantly Shia) and supporting the Shias in Iraq .
Kurds. Supported by some individual Turks and Iranians who would like to see the re-emergence of Kurdistan. The Global movement for Kurdistan raises money in other countries from displaced Kurds and sympathetic individuals. Not surprisingly, the largest support to the Kurds is from small to medium sized arms merchants.
Those are the three sources of unrest in Iraq.
I commend to you Occam's razor.
You have come to some interesting, but unsubstantiable conclusions about France, Germany and Russia.
USA and Israel are not "behind" the insurrections.
2006-08-18 16:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by Ragnarok 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd say the U.S. and Iran. Bush bought a bunch a lies and has done exactly what AQ and Iran wanted. Saddam out of power. The new government is looking more and more like it's aligning with Tehran rather than with us. Something Bush and Co didn't want to happen.
2006-08-18 16:22:26 · answer #4 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Wahhabi of Saudi Arabia. They despise the Shea and think of them as cult members.
When Iraq goes into full on civil war the Wahhabi will rejoice. Ben Laden will be the only winner in this war. The House of Saud will praise him for his actions.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-18 17:15:16 · answer #5 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some folks are fighting with their lives for things they strongly believe in. When the American West was settled, American Indians routinely engaged in suicide attacks which were no less deadly to the settlers. It took a political solution to that problem - in this case placing the Indians onto reservations - to calm things down. We haven't even begun to address the Iraq political issues.
2006-08-18 16:24:57 · answer #6 · answered by Wonderer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush's inability to organise a campaign. If he could have just stolen the war, it would all be over by now.
2006-08-18 16:27:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iran and Syria
2006-08-18 16:19:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Actually, we are . The US of A.
Before Bush started his war for oil Iraq was stable and contained.
2006-08-18 16:22:42 · answer #9 · answered by The answer man 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This administration for not having a plan.
2006-08-18 19:36:58 · answer #10 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋