True...what clinton did was shameful and not good for the world image of america. Funny though isnt it that the cons were more worried then of the worlds view of us than they are now? Noone likes us no and their reply is we dont care what people think about us..
"Clinton was worse because he deteriorated the moral fabric of our country"
I think my safety is more of a concern than my morally defunct neighbors...
Bad morals wont kill me but pissed of nationals of countries we have invaded illegally will!!
2006-08-18 09:10:39 · 12 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because he stood for nothing. Most of America did not like him not just "cons". He never received a majority. A fact that Democrats frequently like to forget or just do not know.
2006-08-19 06:27:07 · answer #1 · answered by C B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Think about what you just stated and put them on scales. Yes, Clinton did some things that many if us do everyday. He's a man that was in a bad situation. When you look at Bush he's a man that controls this bad situation. Not only did he start a war that could have been avoided, but he not only loss America billions of dollars, but he also lost us millions of lives. One thing I can say about Clinton was he was about equal opportunities. Bush left the people in Katrina for dead. Point blank. I think when you compare situation to situation there really is no comparison. Bush is hurting America more.
2006-08-18 16:21:41 · answer #2 · answered by lonnie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is it you guys never seem to remember that Usama planned his attack 2 years before 9/11. I think that was while the great Clinton was in office ( RIGHT)? and what about the USS Cole? and ALL the other attacks that the great Clinton never did a darn thing about? Yea doing nothing and being a coward did not get anyone in this country anything cept Clinton got blown and well the towers did to eventually.
2006-08-18 16:24:41 · answer #3 · answered by barbara_farley77450 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Morals are what keep you safe.......morality is the knowing of what is right or wrong, and doing what is right, just because it is right.....the illegal invasion of countries, as you put it, was okayed by both Libs and Cons in Congress........and the fact that morals won't kill you, it is exactly what could cause your death.......either that, or you think that those that kill actually all think they are right doing it, and should not be in trouble for doing it? I am pretty sure that is never true, you won't see anyone standing around yelling, "Look what I did, aren't I a good little boy!" Who will do this? your morally corrupted neighbors
2006-08-18 16:25:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton was not good for the world image? Excuse me, most of the world was wondering what was the big deal that he got a ********?
Never mind ... I will refrain from arguing this one. History will set the record straight ... after the smoke clears. I guess setting off a global war is moral.
2006-08-18 16:21:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
True Clinton should have shown more restraint and set an example but on the whole he was a mediocre president. Bush is a terrible leader and should be kicked out for such idiotic behaviour.
2006-08-18 16:16:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a standard political tactic, used by both sides.
If you can't respond rationally to the issue at hand, wave your arms and shout and try to distract the person from the issue at hand.
It's like the old joke about lawyers during trial. If you've got the law on your side, argue the law. If you've got the facts on your side, argue the facts. If you've got neither the law nor the facts on your side, thump your fist loudly on the table and demand justice.
As far as comparative scandals, obviously the American people care more about who is having sex with whom than they do about who is listening to their phone calls. Reality-show mentality.
2006-08-18 16:17:02 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Clinton was worse than Bush.
That is my point. Neither one is worse then the other.
However, at least Bush nutted-up and is doing something about the cockroach problem in the middle east.
2006-08-18 17:19:28 · answer #8 · answered by SVern 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cool, give Clinton a medal for getting a BJ in the oval office if it makes you happy.
2006-08-18 19:17:23 · answer #9 · answered by kristycordeaux 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
morals aside, Clinton screwed our economy, cut down on our military aid and drained us financially. Notice that our economy was good while he was in office because of the Bush before him. OUr economy went to crap as an effect of his shitty term. Who cares about morals...they're politicians.
2006-08-18 16:17:48 · answer #10 · answered by calina 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋