You tend to say it objectifies women, degrades them, etc. Let me ask you this:
Answer truthfully:
1. Have you ever worn a low-cut blouse that blatantly showed your cleavage?
2. Have you ever worn certain jeans just because they make your butt look awesome?
3. Have you gotten all dolled up, makeup, stilettos and short skirt, for a night on the town with the girls?
For those who oppose porn and answerd yes: Would it be a valid argument that these things also aid in objectifying women as sex objects? If yes, how do you support your views on porn as an objectification of women?
Further, what about the men? They're getting pretty dirty themselves. Why doesn't anyone make a big deal about the objectification of men? Are they somehow deserving of objectification?
FYI - I've seen several porn movies where the women are pretty damn rude to the poor guy and he's being barked at to "shut up and eat" basically.
: )
2006-08-18 07:39:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
All porn is not DP/Orgy/S&M/etc.
What about good old fashioned m/f?
2006-08-18 07:56:08 · update #1
Is this an argument, or are you truly this unobservant?
Do you not see a girl wearing a short skirt and flirting to be significantly different from a female getting rammed in all three of her holes by a bunch of guys? Do you not see one is using reality as a little play toy to have some fun while the other is simply descending into a mere apparatus to give handles to sexual orafices?
In addition, so if the man gets debased, it somehow makes porn ok? This is feministic nonsense: as long as men are getting abused, its ok! Duh!!! All of humanity is being debased ... and each second and minute and hour that you or anyone watches porn lowers the humanity on the planet.
Doubtless, without a doubt.
(And you don't even know where that last one is from. But if you knew, it would teach you much about the blindness you suffer from when it comes to porn -- (( c*ums to porn? lol )) ).
.
2006-08-18 07:52:58 · answer #1 · answered by robabard 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
2
2016-07-21 13:46:23 · answer #2 · answered by Rhoda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. No.
2. No.
3. No.
I respect my body, and save all the flashing/skin showing for my husband in the privacy of our bedroom. I know what's underneath my clothes, and so does he. There's absolutely no reason for anyone other than my husband to see it. I dress conservatively (regular jeans and a properly fitting t-shirt...not the ultra low rise jeans and some skin tight shirt that shows off everything I have and leaves nothing to the imagination).
Yes these things objectify women as sex objects. I'd like to know when it became okay to go to the grocery store and show more skin than you would at the beach? Then turn around and whine about men who were staring at your chest. Uh...anyone else see a problem with this? Like I said--it leaves nothing to the imagination.
2006-08-18 08:26:15 · answer #3 · answered by brevejunkie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's be honest boys: all the preaching against porn is because we cannot live that dream out on our real lives and most of us have to make do with our normal endowments because those flag poles are nowhere to be seen in real life (not at least when some of us mortals see our image reflected off our mirrors). Sheer frustration passing off as high moral standards.
2006-08-18 07:50:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good points. People say it takes advantage of woman, but men spend billions of dollars every year for it. Now who's really being taken advantage of?
2006-08-18 07:46:30 · answer #5 · answered by mike d 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
weird
2006-08-18 08:00:50 · answer #6 · answered by Hafeman 5000 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good point
2006-08-18 07:46:49 · answer #7 · answered by bregweidd 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
do i know u?
2006-08-18 07:52:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋