English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If so, is that why they support Israel to free the holy land of Arabs in order to bring on the day of judgement?

2006-08-18 05:41:46 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Actually most of the big name neo-cons are Jewish.
Irving Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle

A good artical about the movement can be found here.
http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/neocon101.html

2006-08-18 05:53:12 · answer #1 · answered by TC 3 · 0 1

Your questions assume a lot that is patently untrue. The majority of christians do support Israel but only because they are God's chosen people. You clearly have no understanding of when and under what conditions God's day of judgement will arrive.
I want Israel to occupy all the land God gave to them, but I also believe that arabs and Israelis can co-exhist in such an arrangement.

2006-08-18 12:54:00 · answer #2 · answered by Archer Christifori 6 · 0 0

Neoconservatism, Judaism, and "Dual Loyalty"
Some opponents of neoconservatives have sought to emphasize their interest in Israel and the relatively large proportion of Jewish neoconservatives, and have raised the question of "dual loyalty". A number of critics, such as Pat Buchanan and Juan Cole, have accused them of putting Israeli interests above those of America. In turn these critics have been labeled as anti-Semites by many neoconservatives (which in turn has led to accusations of professional smearing, and then paranoia, and so on).

Some neo-nazi conspiracy theorists such as David Duke have attacked neoconservatism as advancing 'Jewish interests.' Classic anti-Semitic tropes have often been used when elaborating this view, such as the idea that Jews achieve influence through the intellectual domination of national leaders. Similarly, during the run-up to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, left-wing magazine AdBusters published a list of the "50 most influential neocons in the United States", noting that half of these were Jewish (see [11]); although many prominent neoconservatives are not Jewish, among them Michael Novak, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Frank Gaffney, and Max Boot.

Neoconservatives in the 1960s were much less interested in Israel before the June 1967 Six Day War. It was only after this conflict, which raised the specter of unopposed Soviet influence in the Middle East, that the neoconservatives became preoccupied by Israel's security interests. They promote the view that Israel is the United States' strongest ally in the Middle East as the sole Western-style democracy in the region, aside from Turkey (George W. Bush has also supported Turkey in its efforts to join the European Union).

Commenting on the alleged overtones of this view in more mainstream discourse, David Brooks, in his January 6, 2004 New York Times column wrote, "To hear these people describe it, PNAC is sort of a Yiddish Trilateral Commission, the nexus of the sprawling neocon tentacles".

In a similar vein, Michael Lind, a self-described 'former neoconservative,' wrote in 2004, "It is true, and unfortunate, that some journalists tend to use 'neoconservative' to refer only to Jewish neoconservatives, a practice that forces them to invent categories like nationalist conservative or Western conservative for Rumsfeld and Cheney. But neoconservatism is an ideology, like paleoconservatism and libertarianism, and Rumsfeld and Dick and Lynne Cheney are full-fledged neocons, as distinct from paleocons or libertarians, even though they are not Jewish and were never liberals or leftists" (see [12]).

Lind argues that, while "there were, and are, very few Northeastern WASP mandarins in the neoconservative movement", its origins are not specifically Jewish. "...[N]eoconservatism recruited from diverse farm teams including Roman Catholics (William Bennett and Michael Novak) and populists, socialists and New Deal liberals in the South and Southwest (the pool from which Jeane Kirkpatrick, James Woolsey and I [that is, Lind himself] were drawn)" (

2006-08-18 12:52:06 · answer #3 · answered by Kalypsee 3 · 0 1

No, that's just an act to appeal to a large part of their core supporters. Hot button issues tend to appeal to small-minded people, who are willing to overlook corruption and cronyism to control the lives of those who don't necessarily have the same beliefs.

2006-08-18 12:48:38 · answer #4 · answered by Joe D 6 · 0 1

There are a lot of conservatives that are Evangelists and a lot that aren't . Just like the liberals .

2006-08-18 12:52:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. And a number of just regular very good non religous people

2006-08-18 13:19:20 · answer #6 · answered by ace 6 · 0 0

What are NEO Conservative; Are they like
NEO Communists; and NEO MUSLIN'S; OR NEO Bikers

Victor

2006-08-18 12:50:54 · answer #7 · answered by VICTOR 2 · 0 0

That's like saying most Liberals are Atheists.

2006-08-18 12:45:53 · answer #8 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0 0

I understand your logic behind that question, I just do not think that I can answer that question.

2006-08-18 12:49:13 · answer #9 · answered by Nicole C 4 · 0 0

yes

2006-08-18 12:49:09 · answer #10 · answered by idontkno 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers