Does Bush think that if he says Hizb-Allah destroyed Lebanon with bombs we will believe him?

Question

I am sick of that CHIMP always parroting the same answer to every question asked about Lebanon. He was asked a question just now about the war at Camp David and surprise, same answer, "Hizb-Allah caused all the damage to Lebanon." I was under the impression that Israeli bombs blew up Lebanon. The man is a disgrace.

I am grateful to all those that tell me that Israel wasn't fighting Lebanon, just Hizb-Allah. Funny how Israel destroyed Lebanon. If they were a confident army they would be on the ground fighting not killing women and Children from the air. COWARDS.

txguy8800, The world didnot start on spetember 10, 2001. Fool

txguy8800, Why do you people continue to show your ignorance. I'll help you..
Hizb= Party
Allah=God
Therefore put together "Party of God"
You embarrass America. Keep Quiet. Ssssh.

Answer 1

I agree with you completely. The American public is so full of themselves that they believe anything that comes out of his mouth and they believe everything that they read in the paper. Most of this stuff is common sense, how has this war changed courses so many times? What the hell are we fighting for, better question what are families losing loved ones for? Meanwhile, the people who actually died in 9/11 (which was the "reason" why we went to war) are being treated poorly. 5 Years after the fact they are able to hear audio from that day, but just about every week we are bombarded with video and audio of some terrorist talking about what he plans to do to the US. I mean come one people lets start using our brains here. Bush is only interested in his money interest there. He has his own agenda and he does not care who or what he has to lose, kill or compromise to carry out that agenda. What he needs to do is end this non-sense, bring these men and women home and teach his daughters that if they are going to drink and party they should do it responsibly.

Answer 2

I think he was meaning they were responsible, not that they had actually set off bombs within their own areas. Pundits across the world have questioned whether they had become to bold for their own good. Their capture of several Israeli soldiers is what is publicly set off the war between Hezbollah (not Lebanon mind you) and Israel.

Also, Israel is not at war with Lebanon, they're not engaged with their military, they're fighting a party / sect / nation within Lebanon.

Answer 3

This current administration has used the old method of "Tell a Lie often enough and it will become the truth", better than any in history.

Sure it is a management tool (some would say propaganda) used by corporations schools governments world wide. But Karl and company have it down to a science.

Saddam's agents meet in Prague
Aluminum tubes
Yellow Cake
WND

This list is very long. and not just for war. Social Security is facing bankruptcy Prescription Drug Benefit. etc.

Go big Red Go

Answer 4

When Hezbollah entered Israel & abducted 2 soldiers while killing other soldiers, then started launchin Katushya rockets at residential Israeli targets while hiding amongst civilians in Lebanon, they left Israel no choice but to fight back. It is 100% Hezbollahs fault that Lebanon is in shambles, & idiots like you want to praise the aggressor just because they are weaker. If Hezbollah had the might of Israel & vice versa, Israel and its Jewish citizens would be erradicated without provocation.

Answer 5

thanks humanist. You are our porte-parole. I wonder if Bush and the ones defending him on this site know what is Hizb-allah or even where is Lebanon . We are now the terrorists number one. Do you think it is over? u should hear the Israel planes today in Lebanon sky...Do they have the right to invade our sky? and if they see a truck and suspect it carries weappons? Tell me what happens then?

Answer 6

Just when I think I've seen the dumbest question on this site, I see questions like yours. The sad thing is that I know there is nothing I can say because you're mind is already made up.

When Bush referred to Hezbolah destroying Lebanon, he referred to their initiation of the conflict by kidnapping two of Israel's soldiers. Hezbolah was the cause of much of Lebanon's destruction because they initiated the conflict.

The Israelis finally got tired of Hezbolah attacks on their northern border that they finally gave a great military response the these actions. Then Hezbolah using missles from Iran, further attacked Iraeli cities. Hezbolah used the tactic of hiding their military arsenal in neighborhoods where thousands of Lebanese citizens lived. Israel got tired of Hezbolah tactics and went after them anyway causing massive colateral damage to civilians. Its up to you to blame Hezbolah or Israel for the damage to civilians.

What people like you don't understand is that when you ask such dumb questions based on your interpretation of part of a statement, you only show your ignorance. You don't have a clue do you?

Your hate of Bush blinds you to the truth. I guess you would prefer that we Americans hide our head in the sand and hope we don't have another 9-11. You may say our actions have caused the Muslims to hate us and we should just butt out. Right? Well if this is true, why did we get attacked on 9-11 before we went into Afghanistan or Iraq? You don't realize that if we do nothing, that will only encourage those who hate us to attack us even more. I guess you would prefer our troups to be fighting in New York instead of Bagdad?

I could dislike you because its people like you who hurt our country with your negative rhetoric, but instead I pity you. All you do is listen to CNN and the major networks and you spew their nagativism just like the chimp you accuse Bush of being.

You truly have my sympathy.

TX Guy

Answer 7

Actually , Hiz-Bollocks was directly responsible for the deaths of every single civilian that died.

Reasons:
1) They themselves dressed as civilians, so how many of the civilians that died were really Hiz-Bollocks *******?
2) They detained civilians, not letting them leave when the Israelis were kind enough to warn of impending bombings.
3) They used "civilians" as shields and their homes as bases.
4) None of this would have happened if Hiz-Bollcoks had been disbanded as was mandated long ago.
5) None of this would have happened had Hiz-Bollocks not kidnapped/killed those soldiers and the 18 year old settler.
6) None of this would have happened if Hiz-Bollcoks were not a terrorist organization who killed over 250 marines and were the scum of the earth. No better than Al Quaeda.

So, inevitably, the responsibility falls on them.

Answer 8

It doesn't matter what you believe. Facts are facts. The terrorists instigated the problem and are therefore responsible for setting Lebanon back a dozen years.

Answer 9

Those hezbollah terrrorist did cause the damage, how can you not see this. They fired upon Israel first. Israel was just protecting herself, same as you would do.

Answer 10

Go Nicole C!! He is so stupid and manipulated by his aides that he thinks we will believe whatever he tells us. Remember, it is all fear based and he wants to keep us afraid so we will follow him blindly like many in this country have. He does have his own agenda, and believe me, it's not with our best intertests in mind. And I suspect his daughters are as stupid as he is.