I don't know but it seems more likely he didn't. I think the media has been duped.
2006-08-18 04:17:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i have were given not seen any of the extremely recommendations, and that i do not imagine of any persons on good right here might want to have had lots get good of get admission to to to it, both. So, i do not imagine of any persons can understand the finished tale till he's unquestionably convicted, or perchance then, there is probable an effective type of stuff that the traditional public heavily isn't prompt. That aside, even if, i'd not be taken aback both way. The case maintains to be particularly lots up interior the air, or maybe as it grew to develop into into presented that they had a suspect, i grew to develop into into genuinely taken aback that they theory that they had sufficient recommendations against someone to arrest them. i grew to develop into into less than the various result that lots of what that they had were rendered unusable with the aid of very reality of an infection of the crime scene. i bypass off of Karr's Wikipedia internet web site, good right here, which will or might want to not be unclear, yet I deliver mutually that the recommendations they have against him is fairly circumstantial, which, mutually as not precisely suspect, isn't precisely damning, both. So, i in my view don't have any theory. what's for particular, even if, is that he's an entire weirdo, and that i in my view do not imagine of he might want to need to be on the line, inspite of no count number if or not he killed JonBenet. It feels like he's finished lots of harm elsewhere.
2016-11-05 02:25:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he did not do it.
But several people are admiring the father of JonBenet for his "class" in not shouting " I told you so! It wasn't me!." Instead he is thanking the police for their continuous effort. But if the father did have something to do with her death, of course he's not going to rant and rave. He is too relieved that he may get away with it!
Besides, John Karr looks gay anyway.
2006-08-18 06:52:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by emily1980 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
I think he was up to some sick **** in Thailand (most likley involving sex with children) and got caught. Rather than face time in Thai jail, he admitted a committing a crime that he was (a little too) familiar with as a way to get extradited to the US, where he would face no charges, since the crime(s) he was arrested for in Thailand were not committed on US soil.
Either that or he is just so mentally ill and has done so much research on the Ramsey case that he beilieves he committed it.
2006-08-18 04:21:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I did at first when they started airing the reports, I was so happy that they found the murderer (though I always thought the mom had something to do with it). But at this point in time i'm really questioning...I think that John Karr may have known the Ramsey's, but I don't think he killed her. His ex-wife says that he was with her in Alabama the night in question. I guess we'll have to wait and see until when and if they talk with the wife and his brother (who lives here in the Atlanta area). Myself though, it looks like he didn't do it.
2006-08-18 04:18:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by aloneinga 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm really confused. He may not have killed JonBenet, but didn't he say that she "accidentally" died in the basement? That's a random place to "accidentally" die. One would think that suspects who claim such things are probably covering up their murder. However, it is very possible that he didn't do it, and ended up in the wrong place at the wrong time. But who knows? He could be in cahoots with whoever DID do it somehow. I hope they figure it out soon, though.
2006-08-18 04:22:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No...something is not right with him and the confession. I think he fell in love with the case/Jonbenet and in some sick and twisted way he adopted the crime. Something just not right with him...he's like a wannabe Hannibal.
2006-08-18 05:23:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by camissoul 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really don't know if he did it. Some of the stuff just doesn't add up. Like saying he druged her, the tox report said there were no drugs in her body. And the kill was an accident. Bashing a little girls skull is doesn't seem like an accident. So I really don't know now.
2006-08-18 04:23:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm stumped. His wife claims he was not in Colorado at the time of the murder, that he was with her in another state. I think that he is just some nutcase confessing to something he didn't do. Or maybe he did do something, not this, and is getting things mixed up. I always thought that the mother had something to do with it. Wasn't there something brought up about how the screen was cut outward and not inward?
2006-08-18 04:23:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by ginger sue 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately Not. He didn't want to be in the Thai prison and he was so in touch with the case- he confessed as a way of excaping Thailand. The sad part is- at this point he may have convinced himself he was with her when she died.
2006-08-18 04:20:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lady in Pink 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so....the evidence still doesn't fit with him.
I think he's a bit psychotic (that's an understatement) and he's just doing it for attention.
It is quite obvious though that he does need to be put in jail as he has been accused of child molestation in the past.
2006-08-18 04:20:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by MerlinTheCat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋