English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I thought I read this somewhere. If so it just adds to all the "coincidences" about 9/11 being an inside job by the government.

2006-08-18 04:02:37 · 7 answers · asked by heynowpauly 2 in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

A pivotal point came with President Bush’s 11 September 1990 "Toward a New World Order" speech to a joint session of Congress. This time it was Bush, not Gorbachev, whose idealism was compared to Woodrow Wilson, and to FDR at the creation of the UN. Key points picked up in the press were:

Commitment to U.S. strength, such that it can lead the world toward rule of law, rather than use of force. The Gulf crisis was seen as a reminder that the U.S. must continue to lead, and that military strength does matter, but that the resulting new world order should make military force less important in the future.
Soviet-American partnership in cooperation toward making the world safe for democracy, making possible the goals of the UN for the first time since its inception. Some countered that this was unlikely, and that ideological tensions would remain, such that the two superpowers could be partners of convenience for specific and limited goals only. The inability of the USSR to project force abroad was another factor in skepticism toward such a partnership.
Another caveat raised was that the new world order was based not on U.S.-Soviet cooperation, but really on Bush-Gorbachev cooperation, and that the personal diplomacy made the entire concept exceedingly fragile.
Future cleavages were to be economic not ideological, with the First and Second world cooperating to contain regional instability in the Third World. Russia could become an ally against economic assaults from Asia, Islamic terrorism, and drugs from Latin America.
Soviet integration into world economic institutions, such as the G7, and establishment of ties with the European Community.
Restoration of German sovereignty and Cambodia’s acceptance of the UN Security Council’s peace plan on the day previous to the speech were seen as signs of what to expect in the new world order
The reemergence of Germany and Japan as members of the great powers, and concomitant reform of the UN Security Council was seen as necessary for great power cooperation and reinvigorated UN leadership
Europe was seen as taking the lead on building their own world order, while the U.S. was relegated to the sidelines. The rationale for U.S. presence on the continent was vanishing, and the Gulf crisis was seen an incapable of rallying Europe. Instead Europe was discussing the European Community, the CSCE, and relations with the USSR. Gorbachev even proposed an all-European security council to replace the CSCE, in effect superseding the increasingly irrelevant NATO.
A very few postulated a bi-polar new order of U.S. power and UN moral authority, the first as global policeman, the second as global judge and jury. The order would be collectivist, in which decisions and responsibility would be shared.

2006-08-18 04:10:45 · answer #1 · answered by the answerman 3 · 2 1

Follow this link to see Bush Sr. promoting his global socialist ideolgy in front of Congress - the same ideology that his good buddy Bill Clinton and his son George have been pursuing (you can also right click and select save). You need Real Player.

http://robodoon.com/realg2/Bush%20Sr.rm

1990 February 28 President Bush in fund raising speech in SF

"Time and again in this century, the political map of the world was transformed. And in each instance, a new world order came about through the advent of a new tyrant or the outbreak of a bloody global war, or its end.

"For two centuries we've done the hard work of freedom. And tonight we lead the world in facing down a threat to decency and humanity. What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea - a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children's future."

President George Bush State of the Union Address 1991

"We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders."

President George Bush 1991

"We will succeed in the Gulf. And when we do, the world community will have sent an enduring warning to any dictator or despot, present or future, who contemplates outlaw aggression. The world can therefore seize this opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order - where brutality will go unrewarded, and aggression will meet collective resistance."

President George Bush State of the Union Address 1991

Aug 1991

“National Security Strategy of the United States” is issued by the White House, and it is personally sighed by President Bush. It states”

”In the Gulf, we saw the United Nations playing the role dreamed of by its founders….I hope history will record that the Gulf Crisis was the crucible of the new world order”

2006-08-18 04:19:42 · answer #2 · answered by shorebreak 3 · 1 0

Yes he did: Sept. 11, 1991

I come to this House of the people to speak to you and all Americans, certain that we stand at a defining hour. Halfway around the world, we are engaged in a great struggle in the skies and on the seas and sands. We know why we're there: We are Americans, part of something larger than ourselves. For two centuries, we've done the hard work of freedom. And tonight, we
lead the world in facing down a threat to decency and humanity.

What is at stake is more than one small country; it is a big idea: a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind -- peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle and worthy of our children's future.


Hitler: Our Children , Their Future
r“Secular schools can never be tolerated because such schools have no religious instruction, and a general moral instruction without a religious foundation is built on air; consequently, all character training and religion must be derived from faith.”

( Adolf Hitler, in 26 April 1933

2006-08-18 05:16:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hitler gave same speech in the 30s. watch free video "martial law9 11 :rise of the police state" many many connections of bush family to the rise of and financing of Nazis new world order. I'm scared of g.b. s plan for a one world global empire. as i am not rich I'm doomed to become an industrial slave. good luck to you and always question authority.

2006-08-18 04:22:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it was given on Sept 11, but in 1990.

2006-08-18 04:11:15 · answer #5 · answered by Christina H 4 · 0 0

That speech (which was awesome...) was given on March 6th, 1991...

Don't buy in to stupid conspiracy theories..

2006-08-18 04:09:25 · answer #6 · answered by crazyotto65 5 · 1 0

are you sure it was Bush, or Hitler in 1935 lol

2006-08-18 04:09:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers