English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Very small as a percentage of the amount of the money the USA contributes. USA provides approximately 1/4 of the entire UN budget.

Perhaps other countries should sit down and shut up.


Addendum for Kristy: Sorry, the land escheats to the Rockefeller foundation if the UN is no longer there. It is not US property.

Further Addendum: Do I have a twin now? We seem to have some similar thoughts, but I haven't earned my red wings. But it really isn't me. And I am aware of organizations above the illuminati and the bilderbergers and the illuminati.

2006-08-23 14:28:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Not very big. Do you even understand your own question? US frequently enjoys observer status, most often in foreign elections. US also acts in an observer status in conflicts.

Since US primarily pays for the UN, votes should not only go their way, but the amount of contribution to the UN should dictate the number of votes on every topic.

US occasionally withholds small amounts of money allocated to particular actions, currently, primarily US tries to withhold those funds earmarked for abortions.

US has about the best credit history of any member of the UN.

Where did you get your "ideas", and I use the term loosely.

2006-08-26 01:02:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The US should kick out the un from its shores. It should drop being in the un. It is made up of a bunch of loser 3rd rate countries trying to make themselves look or at least feel like they actually matter. The US is the only super power. We should start a new organization with Britain and Israel. Give these countries best friend status with priority trade status. Make up a charter that reflects our combined interests. If any country who wants to trade with us with better status then they must agree to the charter and actually buy something from us, not just dump their junk on our shores. With out ever buying anything.
The un expects the USA to be the policeman of the world. Last time I checked most policeman get paid for their work. So if any other country wants protection and they are are able to pay with either cash, goods or services. We charge them! If they can not afford then we should do charity work as long it is in our interest or because we are decent Christian nation for humanitarian causes. Not protecting Germany, France, or Japan. Who can afford to pay for protection! Then bad mouth us with a mouth full of our free food! If any country has terrorist who kidnaps our citizens or bombs our assets at home or any where on the planet. Then we go in get our people out if the host country does not deal with them swiftly and effectively. As long as our people are being feed proper meals given proper amounts of water., and safe let them keep them. We tell the host country what ever happens to our people and or assets we can guarantee that country and terrorist group will get ten times more of the same. And mean it! Then do it! There will be only one occurrence. Then the pu$$e countries will toe the line

2006-08-25 22:03:36 · answer #3 · answered by iamwelndowd1 2 · 0 0

Lets see the UN stole 25 billion dollars in the Oil for food program alone. That was your tax dollars.

I think the UN should have observer status(without a vote)

2006-08-25 13:27:54 · answer #4 · answered by Gone Rogue 7 · 3 0

U.N. is the first step toward a New World Order.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6642758020554799808&q=
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6987303668075230852&q=

The Illuminati are forging the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World order, ruled by the martial law.
They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
Bush and Kerry | Skull and Bone : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Bush+skull

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Make you investigations about Jesuits, the New World Order, the Illuminatis, the Free-Masonery, the Death Clan. They plan a world reduction of population of 80%...Far worse than Hitler...
They are preparing us for 2012, for the New Age, of Relelations, and the return of « God » from Nibiru.
“the zenith meridian at Giza runs through Jupiter at the Hyades in Taurus”, this means “the kingdom (Jupiter) will be restored to Egypt (Taurus) at that precise moment. Thus, Osiris, the Bull of Egypt, will return from the dead at 22:18:13 on December 21, 2012.” El Cairo time.

2006-08-24 17:06:36 · answer #5 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 2 1

At the end of May it is $1,286,000,000. The annual cost to the US for participating in the socialist farce called the UN is approximately this amount, so I guess you could say we are a year behind.

I think it best America quit spending money on this insanity and use the money in America or reduce the taxes by this amount and let those who earned it, keep it.

GET OUT OF THE UN NOW!

2006-08-25 13:13:48 · answer #6 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0 0

In theory agree with you, but believe have heard this answer given to why are we not like Russia at the start of the Koran War, and heard the following: The US does many things for UN besides paying it's dues. Sounds like poor rationalization to me.

2006-08-18 11:09:53 · answer #7 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 2 0

As percentage of total budget, USA contributes more to the annual funding for UN. Additionally, USA are the largest owner of the tranche which funds the UN. UN falls apart without USA funding.

2006-08-26 02:11:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The UN has done little good. Few do much but laugh at it. Many of the delegates just syffen assets into their own pockets.

2006-08-25 22:12:33 · answer #9 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 3 0

I say get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US.

Let the communists go somewhere else.

2006-08-18 11:00:06 · answer #10 · answered by shorebreak 3 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers