They are racist against everybody that's not white...tom science
2006-08-18 03:47:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by tom science 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
I'm a liberal Democrat who disagrees with most neoconservative notions.
Still, I give them the benefit of the doubt on racism.
What you're actually seeing, I believe, is the strong nationalism that drives neoconservative thinking. In their view, America's chief obligation is to take care of itself, and to promote its values to the rest of the world.
At the moment, in the neocon view, the part of the world where Arabs live is most in need of American democratic values. Therefore, it may appear the neocons are "against" Arabs.
If things were different, it might appear the neocons were "against" Koreans because of the unpredictability and belligerence of the North Korean government.
By the way, another major concern of the neocons and, probably, most Americans is Iran and its continued threats to develop nuclear weapons. While Iran's population is 98 percent Muslim (the vast majority of these Shi'a Muslims), it is *not* an Arab country. Just over half of Iranians are ethnically Persian; only 3 percent are Arab.
2006-08-18 12:19:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by johntadams3 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to define "racist". If you mean being aware of the religion and ethnicity of those who attacked us on 9/11 and continue to attack the Western world, then I will plead guilty to such "racism."
We need to drop the PC bullsh!t and racially profile as an important step toward acknowledging that it's Islamic fascists who are trying to not only kill Americans but all non-Muslims.
Unfortunately, it seems liberals' sensibilities keep them from acknowledging this.
Having said that, openly stating that we're racially profiling would be stupid, as it would simply tell those Islamo-fascists they need to recruit more "American" looking people. Well, I don't think they'll find as many willing suicide-bomb candidates among Westerners. But in the meantime, at least we will have forced them to change tactics.
In football, if a team's offense is killing you by running the ball, you're going to adjust your defense to try to stop the run. If they move to the pass, fine; at least you've stopped the run, and they may or may not be successful with the pass.
But by failing to racially profile, we're letting the terrorists run the ball while we stand on the sidelines scratching our heads, insisting that we need to defend the run and pass equally.
2006-08-18 10:57:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lawn Jockey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
great question!!
cofusing isn't it? Where are Bush's Islamofacsists when it comes to having UAE operate our ports- (note- that quietly DID happen, y'know) and when it comes to all those Bin Laden family dinner bashes, and all the Arab stock holding interests in major US companies and media-
is it just a giant FLIP FLOP on the cult of personality- ?
is "Islamofacsist" just a BUZZWORD to rally support and piss-off Muslim folk?
I think the Neocons love Arabian people- but it's ok that in Arabia women are STILL publicly stoned, slain, burned alive, because they may be suspect of cheating on the husband- but you might guess that it's really the husband sticking her out there because he is the REAL "cheating willy" ...un freeking -real!
so anyways- the only stuff we get as the public is what were supposed to get to keep us distracted from the truth-
please take a peak at ALL three links below
(((God, if your out there, we need your help real bad....)))
2006-08-18 11:15:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by omnimog 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
i think its 'progressive' liberals, who use the black vote that are racists
who lead the charge against the dubai ports deal? it was the democrats.
you cant tell me that wasnt big time profiling there. but why did they get away with it, and people think repubs are racists. heck, the repub party was created to combat racism and the dixie segregationist party. it was a republican (nixon) that passed the civil rights act. the only 'racists' politicians repubs have had were former democrats who changed parties. the current democrats have KKK leader, 'sheets' byrd as a ranking member
maybe someone can explain this for me...
2006-08-18 10:51:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by jasonalwaysready 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obviously not; the Carlyle Group is riddled with Neocons AND Arabs.
2006-08-18 10:48:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Nope just racist against ignorant liberal offspring. What are you 16?
My proof? Do a search for the Civil Rights votes, and see how many democrats voted AGAINST giving blacks civil rights....it will blow your mind. Also, look at the Republican votes...and while we are on it....prior & during the Civil War...Lincoln was against slavery..and was GASP! A Republican....
The democrats of this country are the true bane!!
2006-08-18 10:51:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Whiskeytangofoxtrot 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Only if you agree that Neolibs are racist against blacks and Hispanics. Aftre all, it is the libs who think that Hispanics are too stupid to learn English and too stupid to understand it is against the law to enter a country illegally. And only libs think that blacks cannot succeed without affirmative action.
Ergo, libs are MORE racist as a group than conservatives.
2006-08-18 10:50:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
i am happy for you that you are able to use your new "label" in a complete sentence. i have to wonder if you could even define a neocon. please stop repeating what other idiots have to say. you will come off sounding a bit more educated and credible.
2006-08-18 10:50:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Teufel 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I've got no beef with peaceful, sane people of any stripe. The murderous thugs of the world, however, can feel free to think of me as an enemy.
2006-08-18 10:49:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No
NeoCons are king and loving people Just like Jesus told them to be. They give money to the GOP/RNC and pray that God will kill all the Ni**ers G**ks and Rag H**ds. So they can have peace and a bigger SUV
Go big Red Go
2006-08-18 11:06:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by 43 5
·
0⤊
4⤋