English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-18 00:55:25 · 7 answers · asked by Bipin mishra 3 in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

it is better than having a president like some we know and the uncertainty of a presidential election

2006-08-18 01:02:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

never lived under any other kind of state so i don't have first hand knowledge of what its like in a non democratic country but i would hope kingship is relevant and will stay that way

2006-08-21 10:03:33 · answer #2 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0 0

I like the Belgian King. He rides a motorbike.
The question to me is more a case of is aristocracy in general relevant these days?

2006-08-18 03:23:26 · answer #3 · answered by Part Time Cynic 7 · 0 0

We need a Head of State who is non political and independant. Prince Charles is a stupid spoilt man who is unfit for the job. most of the Royal Family(except the Queen) are useless.

2006-08-21 21:23:56 · answer #4 · answered by Rob Roy 6 · 0 0

Yes,it's better to live in a kingdom than some of the rubbishy republics I've visited

2006-08-18 01:34:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In certain areas - Yes- Burger King has many supporters and Wan King still has a huge following and there are numerous ****Kings that continue to survive ,why not write down as many as you can ? = might be fun

2006-08-21 05:39:03 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

No , up the Republic

2006-08-18 01:06:31 · answer #7 · answered by Richard H 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers